[fuzzing] Updated the workflow and tried to simplify the OSS-fuzz and local fuzzing build.

[pkillarjun]

• Updated workflow to use all three sanitizers [address, undefined, memory];
• Update the target under test to ini_parse_string from ini_parse for better coverage and ease of use and understanding.
• Removed AFL fuzzer build and use only standard libFuzzer. Note, if you like to build with AFL++, you can use AFL++ official libAFLDriver.a library for libFuzzer targets.
• After this PR merge, I will remove the build.sh from the official oss-fuzz repo and use oss-fuzz.sh for compilation in the oss-fuzz infrastructure.

Hey Benhoyt,
I will use this account to maintain all my OSS-Fuzz integrated projects.

[0x34d]

Comment for Verification;

[pkillarjun]

Everything is working as expected https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/actions/runs/8821238582

[benhoyt]

Hi @pkillarjun -- thanks for the contribution. I've thought about this further, and decided I don't have the time or knowledge to properly review OSS-Fuzz scripts and PRs. In addition, the 0x34d "Professional backdoor shipper" joke turned me off a bit. So I'm going to remove the OSS-Fuzz support from this repo. You're welcome to fork inih and add OSS-Fuzz support in your fork. I'm sorry about that!

[pkillarjun]

Well, I never dreamed of this response and #169.

[pkillarjun]

You're welcome to fork inih and add OSS-Fuzz support in your fork. I'm sorry about that!

I hope you are okay with these changes?
google/oss-fuzz#11836
https://github.com/pkillarjun/oss-fuzz-src/commit/2f680c1722f8d0ce5731ee8defaa78e748c3049f https://github.com/pkillarjun/oss-fuzz-src/tree/main/inih

[benhoyt]

I know it's not what you we're hoping for. But I appreciate you moving the oss-fuzz stuff to a fork. Those changes look reasonable to me!

[pkillarjun]

I know it's not what you we're hoping for. But I appreciate you moving the oss-fuzz stuff to a fork. Those changes look reasonable to me!

I understand your thoughts on forks, but OSS-Fuzz does not accept forks of some random dude on the internet,
Don't worry, I will be managing this.

[DonggeLiu]

Hi @benhoyt, I am a maintainer of OSS-Fuzz.
May I double-check if you are still interested in using the OSS-Fuzz service (fuzzing inih, receiving reports, etc.)?
Thanks!

Just want to ensure that I understand the situation correctly : )

[benhoyt]

@DonggeLiu I don't mind if someone else uses the OSS-Fuzz service to fuzz inih, and I'm happy to receive real bug reports, but I'd rather not maintain the fuzz code and scripts anymore in my inih repo.

[DonggeLiu]

Thanks for the confirmation, @benhoyt.