-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for trail filters #50
Support for trail filters #50
Conversation
gen4_CD_standard are the standard biases for EVK1 gen41 are tuned biases for the EVK2
Hi Andreas, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks again for the PR, please see review comments.
Oh, and you wrote you only did ROS1, but the PR has only ROS2. That is fine. ROS1 is basically end-of-life. |
@berndpfrommer Thanks a lot for the valuable feedback, I'm always happy to learn and improve. It has been a while for me since the last PR with a "senior" developer as reviewer. |
Tests fail due to formatting errors. You can check in your workspace before committing by:
Also please see additional comments: bomb out if invalid filter type is specified. You want to get the user's attention when they are feeding in nonsense parameters. |
Is there something I can help to get the test passing? Looks like there some issues in |
This PR adds support for the trail filters described here. Successfully tested on an EVKv4 from Prophesse.
Note: So far I only implemented it for ROS1.