-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: yara-python-dex installation #411
Conversation
setup.py
Outdated
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ def package_files(directory): | |||
|
|||
|
|||
install_requires = [ | |||
'yara-python-dex>=1.0.1', | |||
"yara-python-dex @ git+https://github.com/MobSF/yara-python-dex.git", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The rest of file uses simple commas (') instead of double commas (")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it be a risky change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it be a risky change?
Yes, it could be that is why I was hesitant to raise the merge request, but there's no solution instead of it on termux(android), even if we go with toml setup we'll have to add git+https://github.com/MobSF/yara-python-dex.git
in requirements for it to be able to complete installation successfully.
Or how about adding a note for It's installation on README?
afaik I've seen in yara-python-dex repo the yara submodule still on the commit of 4yrs old(maintainer mostly changes ci files) so it doesn't feel like something major will arise
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we pointing folks at a prebuilt thing that isn't controlled from the source we maintain? That feels bad.
I know I haven't been a good maintainer and been looking at this for a while, however if there are changes in the branched thing you're pointing at, why not just make a PR to the actual branch we control?
Re-Opened of #410.