Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

renamed merge to union #19

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 4, 2019
Merged

renamed merge to union #19

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 4, 2019

Conversation

bergos
Copy link
Member

@bergos bergos commented Jan 2, 2019

fixes #16

@bergos bergos requested review from blake-regalia and vhf January 2, 2019 00:09
<p>
<dfn>union</dfn>
</p>
<p>Returns a new <a>Dataset</a> that is a concatenation of this dataset and the <code>quads</code> given as an argument.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"concatenation" may be an oversimplification. If any of the datasets contain equal blank nodes, then the blank nodes should be standardized apart according to the RDF spec.

It may be good to link to the section on graph merging in the RDF spec.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't changed the wording. So it only shows up as a change, cause it's sorted alphabetically. Let's keep this PR just about the renaming of merge to union.

Your comments are worth another issue. In the past I've implemented it just as a concatenation and haven't thought about the impact.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, opened #22 for this.

dataset-spec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bergos bergos merged commit 6fff0ec into master Jan 4, 2019
@vhf vhf deleted the merge-to-union branch February 7, 2019 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

.merge() => .union()
4 participants