pkg/gcp: check error when building client

[patrickdillon]

Fixes an unchecked error when building the GCP client.

[patrickdillon]

I'm primarily using this to build a release image to help with debugging.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.90%. Comparing base (ac30067) to head (e0971da).
Report is 57 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/gcp/actuator/actuator.go	0.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #724      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   48.33%   46.90%   -1.43%     
==========================================
  Files          96      102       +6     
  Lines       11801    12160     +359     
==========================================
  Hits         5704     5704              
- Misses       5464     5822     +358     
- Partials      633      634       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pkg/gcp/actuator/actuator.go	56.75% <0.00%> (-0.24%)	⬇️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

[jstuever]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jstuever, patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jstuever]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jstuever]

/override ci/prow/security
This is being tracked and fixed elsewhere.

[openshift-ci]

@jstuever: Overrode contexts on behalf of jstuever: ci/prow/security

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/security
This is being tracked and fixed elsewhere.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[patrickdillon]

/lgtm /approve

oh thanks! I pushed a commit before checking github and stomped on this. I would have created a bug and merged it had I noticed.

I should have marked this wip
/wip

[openshift-ci]

@patrickdillon: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/security	e0971da	link	true	/test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[patrickdillon]

/hold

[openshift-merge-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[jstuever]

/unassign

[openshift-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

[openshift-bot]

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale