Fix kraken2tax requirements and add test

[mvdbeek]

No description provided.

[nsoranzo]

Should this tool be migrated to tools-iuc?

[mvdbeek]

What's the advantage ? I think these low-priority, not-frequrently-updated tools can live here

[mvdbeek]

I see now what the advantage is, but I think it's a nice motivation for galaxyproject/planemo-ci-action#43 and community tool repos in general.

[nsoranzo]

Also we don't test this repo before a new Galaxy release, which won't be "fixed" by reusable workflows.

[mvdbeek]

Also we don't test this repo before a new Galaxy release, which won't be "fixed" by reusable workflows.

We do, it's in the release process. I've just not done it recently.

[mvdbeek]

Actually, neither IUC nor devteam repo tests are part of the "official" release process. We don't do that for e.g bjoern's tools either, i don't think that should be a criterium one way or the other.