Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: intacct export settings watchers #1002

Conversation

JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername
Copy link
Contributor

@JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername commented Oct 4, 2024

Clickup

https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwh86da

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced testing capabilities for the IntacctExportSettingsComponent, including new test cases for form initialization, validation, and dynamic behavior based on user interactions.
    • Introduction of detailed mock data for export settings and destination attributes, improving testing scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed an unused import in the IntacctDashboardComponent test suite for better clarity.
  • Documentation

    • Updated mock data structures to reflect comprehensive configurations for better usability in tests.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the test suites for the IntacctDashboardComponent and IntacctExportSettingsComponent in an Angular application. Key changes include the removal of an unused import in the IntacctDashboardComponent tests and significant enhancements to the IntacctExportSettingsComponent tests, including additional imports, restructuring, and new test cases. The mock data in intacct.fixture.ts has also been redefined to provide a more comprehensive setup for export settings and destination attributes, improving overall test coverage and robustness.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-dashboard/intacct-dashboard.component.spec.ts Removed unused import statement for mockExportSettings.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts Added multiple imports, restructured tests, activated describe block, and added new test cases for initialization, form save, and watchers.
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts Updated mockExportSettings structure, added mockPaginatedDestinationAttributes, and enhanced mock data for export settings and destination attributes.

Possibly related PRs

  • test: intacct dashboard #981: The changes in the intacct-dashboard.component.spec.ts file enhance the test coverage for the IntacctDashboardComponent, which is directly related to the modifications made in the main PR for the IntacctDashboardComponent test suite.
  • test: intacct export settings init, save, and misc functions #1001: This PR also involves modifications to the test suite for the IntacctDashboardComponent, specifically focusing on initialization and export handling, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding the test setup and structure.

Suggested labels

size/L

Suggested reviewers

  • DhaaraniCIT
  • ashwin1111

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
With tests that dance and banish gloom.
Mock data rich, like carrots bright,
Ensuring all components work just right.
So let us hop and celebrate,
For clearer code, we now await! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ecf164 and e0e35eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (5)

14-14: Correct the class name 'PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute' to match naming conventions

The class name PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute should be PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute to adhere to CamelCase naming conventions and improve readability.

Apply the following diff to correct the class name:

- import { IntacctDestinationAttribute, PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute } from 'src/app/core/models/intacct/db/destination-attribute.model';
+ import { IntacctDestinationAttribute, PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute } from 'src/app/core/models/intacct/db/destination-attribute.model';

65-68: Update class name to 'PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute'

Reflect the corrected class name in the usage to maintain consistency.

Apply this diff:

-   of(copy.ACCOUNT as unknown as PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute),
+   of(copy.ACCOUNT as unknown as PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute),

-   of(copy.EXPENSE_PAYMENT_TYPE as unknown as PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute),
+   of(copy.EXPENSE_PAYMENT_TYPE as unknown as PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute),

-   of(copy.VENDOR as unknown as PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute),
+   of(copy.VENDOR as unknown as PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute),

-   of(copy.CHARGE_CARD_NUMBER as unknown as PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute)
+   of(copy.CHARGE_CARD_NUMBER as unknown as PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute)

351-353: Use the corrected class name 'PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute'

Ensure that the updated class name is used consistently throughout the code.

Apply this diff:

- mappingService.getPaginatedDestinationAttributes.and.returnValue(
-   of(mockPaginatedDestinationAttributes.EXPENSE_PAYMENT_TYPE as unknown as PaginatedintacctDestinationAttribute)
+ mappingService.getPaginatedDestinationAttributes.and.returnValue(
+   of(mockPaginatedDestinationAttributes.EXPENSE_PAYMENT_TYPE as unknown as PaginatedIntacctDestinationAttribute)

172-177: Update toast message to reflect all synchronized dimensions

The method refreshDimensions refreshes both Sage Intacct and Fyle dimensions, but the toast message states: 'Syncing data dimensions from Sage Intacct'. Consider updating the toast message to accurately reflect that data dimensions from both platforms are being synchronized for clarity.

Apply this diff to update the toast message:

- expect(toastService.displayToastMessage).toHaveBeenCalledWith(ToastSeverity.SUCCESS, 'Syncing data dimensions from Sage Intacct');
+ expect(toastService.displayToastMessage).toHaveBeenCalledWith(ToastSeverity.SUCCESS, 'Syncing data dimensions from Fyle and Sage Intacct');

294-297: Ensure consistency in date label: 'Spend date' vs. 'Spent date'

The label 'Spend date' might be inconsistent with the corresponding enum value ExportDateType.SPENT_AT. Consider updating the label to 'Spent date' for consistency and clarity.

Apply this diff to correct the label:

-   label: 'Spend date',
+   label: 'Spent date',
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79f863c and 93810e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-main/intacct-dashboard/intacct-dashboard.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-main/intacct-dashboard/intacct-dashboard.component.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (1)

389-389: Verify the brand ID value 'co' in 'C1 Specific Behavior' test

The brandId is set to 'co' in the test for 'C1 Specific Behavior'. Please verify if 'co' is the correct brand ID for C1. If 'c1' is intended, consider updating the brandId to ensure the test behaves as expected.

src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct.fixture.ts (2)

478-478: Verify the split_expense_grouping being set to null.

In the mockExportSettings, the split_expense_grouping is assigned null:

split_expense_grouping: null

Please confirm if this is intentional. If split_expense_grouping is an optional field, assigning null may be acceptable. Otherwise, consider setting it to a valid SplitExpenseGrouping enum value to prevent potential runtime errors.


633-634: Ensure email addresses in test data are fictitious.

The email field for a vendor contains what appears to be a real email address:

Please verify that this email is fictitious and used solely for testing purposes. Using real email addresses can lead to privacy concerns and unintended data exposure.

export const mockPaginatedDestinationAttributes = {
ACCOUNT: {
"count": 4,
"next": "http://intacct-api.staging-integrations:8000/api/workspaces/366/sage_intacct/paginated_destination_attributes/?attribute_type=ACCOUNT&limit=100&offset=100",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid hardcoding absolute URLs in test fixtures.

The next field in mockPaginatedDestinationAttributes contains a hardcoded absolute URL:

"next": "http://intacct-api.staging-integrations:8000/api/workspaces/366/sage_intacct/paginated_destination_attributes/?attribute_type=ACCOUNT&limit=100&offset=100",

Hardcoding environment-specific URLs can cause issues when running tests in different environments. Consider using a relative URL or a placeholder to make the test fixture more flexible and environment-agnostic.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/M Medium PR label Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (1)

285-288: Ensure consistent cleanup in tests

In the Custom Watchers describe block, the beforeEach at lines 286-288 sets brandingConfig.brandId = 'fyle';, but there is no corresponding cleanup within this block. While there is an afterAll in the C1 Specific Behavior block, it's important to maintain test isolation within each describe block.

Consider adding an afterEach to reset brandingConfig.brandId to its original value to ensure test independence.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 93810e1 and 1ecf164.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts

[failure] 316-316:
["setCCExpenseDateOptions"] is better written in dot notation


[failure] 359-359:
Too many nested callbacks (5). Maximum allowed is 4


[failure] 377-377:
Too many nested callbacks (5). Maximum allowed is 4

tick(1000);

expect(mappingService.getPaginatedDestinationAttributes).toHaveBeenCalledWith('EXPENSE_PAYMENT_TYPE', 'test');
expect(component.destinationOptions.EXPENSE_PAYMENT_TYPE.every(option => (option.detail ? option.detail.is_reimbursable : true))).toBeTrue();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Reduce nested callbacks to enhance readability

At line 359, there's a nesting depth of 5 callbacks, which exceeds the maximum recommended depth of 4. This can make the test harder to read and maintain.

Consider refactoring the test to reduce the nesting level. You might extract some of the inner functions or use async/await if applicable.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[failure] 359-359:
Too many nested callbacks (5). Maximum allowed is 4

@DhaaraniCIT DhaaraniCIT requested a review from ashwin1111 October 8, 2024 09:33
@JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername added the deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging label Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging size/M Medium PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants