test: intacct export settings edge cases and utility functions

[JustARatherRidiculouslyLongUsername]

Clickup

this closes https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwh86c9

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced test suite for the IntacctExportSettingsComponent with new test cases for form validation and user interactions.
  • Added tests for utility functions related to navigation and field mapping.
  • Introduced sections for specific behaviors and edge cases to improve test coverage.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the test suite for the IntacctExportSettingsComponent. Key modifications include the addition of new imports, utility functions, and test cases that cover form validation and user interactions. The structure of the tests has been reorganized to include sections for specific behaviors and edge cases related to expense handling, improving overall test coverage and ensuring comprehensive validation of the component's functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts	Enhanced test suite with new imports, utility functions, and additional test cases for validation and user interactions. Added methods: navigateToPreviousStep(), getEmployeeFieldMapping(field, object), and getExportType(object). Reorganized test structure to include specific behavior and edge cases.

Possibly related PRs

• test: intacct export settings init, save, and misc functions #1001: This PR enhances the test suite for the IntacctExportSettingsComponent, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the testing of the IntacctExportSettingsComponent.
• test: intacct export settings watchers #1002: This PR focuses on testing the watchers in the IntacctExportSettingsComponent, which aligns with the main PR's updates to the test structure and functionality of the component.
• test: add unit tests for IntacctComponent #969: This PR adds unit tests for the IntacctComponent, which may share some testing strategies or structures with the IntacctExportSettingsComponent tests, although it is less directly related than the previous two.
• test: intacct dashboard #981: This PR enhances the test coverage for the IntacctDashboardComponent, which may have some overlap in functionality with the IntacctExportSettingsComponent, particularly in terms of integration testing.
• fix: page size change not updating localstorage #990: This PR addresses pagination and search functionality in the IntacctCompletedExportLogComponent, which could relate to the overall testing framework and practices used in the main PR's updates.

Suggested reviewers

• DhaaraniCIT
• ashwin1111

Poem

In the meadow where rabbits play,
Tests are hopping in a brand new way.
With fields that toggle and steps to trace,
Our code now dances with a happy face!
So here’s to the changes, let’s give a cheer,
For a brighter future, the bunnies hold dear! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (1)

1-1: Consider limiting the scope of ESLint rule disabling

Disabling ESLint's dot-notation rule at the file level might hide potential issues. Consider disabling it only where necessary or refactoring the code to comply with the rule.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79f863c and 896ee5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (4 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (13)

src/app/integrations/intacct/intacct-shared/intacct-export-settings/intacct-export-settings.component.spec.ts (13)

175-182: Utility Functions tests are well-structured

The added tests for utility functions enhance test coverage and are properly structured.

---

183-186: Navigation function test is accurate

The test for navigateToPreviousStep correctly verifies the navigation behavior.

---

188-200: Tests for getEmployeeFieldMapping cover key scenarios

The tests effectively validate the different cases for getEmployeeFieldMapping, ensuring correct mapping based on input parameters.

---

202-208: getExportType function tests are comprehensive

The tests for getExportType cover all possible inputs and verify the expected outputs.

---

215-234: Reimbursable Expense Toggle Watcher tests are thorough

The tests accurately check the enabling and disabling of form validators based on the reimbursable expense toggle.

---

236-261: Reimbursable Export Type Watcher functions correctly

The tests for changes in reimbursableExportType ensure that the form fields react appropriately to different export types.

---

263-282: Credit Card Expense Toggle Watcher tests are accurate

The tests validate that the form fields for credit card expenses are enabled or disabled based on the toggle, ensuring proper form behavior.

---

284-316: CCC Export Type Watcher handles various export types effectively

The tests for cccExportType changes confirm that dependent form fields are updated correctly, covering all export object types.

---

318-350: Custom Watchers accurately update expense grouping date options

The tests confirm that expense grouping date options are correctly updated when grouping options change, ensuring consistency in form options.

---

353-371: Export Selection Validator functions as expected

The tests ensure that the form validation accurately requires at least one export type to be selected, preventing invalid form states.

---

373-420: Destination Options Handling is robust

The tests for option searches in dropdowns effectively validate the search functionality and ensure the correct filtering of options based on search terms.

---

425-441: C1 Specific Behavior test is correctly implemented

The test verifies the component behavior under specific branding conditions, ensuring that the form defaults and settings are appropriate for the 'co' brand.

---

443-497: Edge Cases are thoroughly tested

The tests address various edge cases, such as unset CCC expense objects and the correct enabling of fields, ensuring robust handling of unusual scenarios.