Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OPIK-160] Fix trace and span error during insertion due to input/output size #362

Merged

Conversation

thiagohora
Copy link
Contributor

@thiagohora thiagohora commented Oct 9, 2024

Details

Testing locally, we managed to reproduce the error, which was apparently due to some truncation of the statement. A temporary fix is to increase the query size limit. However, we will address this soon with the ClickHouse consultancy

Issues

#OPIK-160

Testing

Add tests to simulate error

Documentation

@thiagohora thiagohora requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 15:37
@thiagohora thiagohora changed the title [OPIK-160] Fix trace and span error during insertion due to input/out… [OPIK-160] Fix trace and span error during insertion due to input/output size Oct 9, 2024
Nimrod007
Nimrod007 previously approved these changes Oct 9, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@Nimrod007 Nimrod007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thiagohora nice!

@thiagohora thiagohora force-pushed the thiagohora/OPIK-160_error_when_inserting_span_and_trace branch from 643d98e to f615637 Compare October 9, 2024 15:57
@thiagohora thiagohora requested a review from Nimrod007 October 9, 2024 16:21
@thiagohora
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging, but FYI, @andrescrz.

I believe we can discuss this with the consultancy.

@thiagohora thiagohora merged commit 63d162b into main Oct 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@thiagohora thiagohora deleted the thiagohora/OPIK-160_error_when_inserting_span_and_trace branch October 9, 2024 17:34
@andrescrz
Copy link
Collaborator

andrescrz commented Oct 10, 2024

Merging, but FYI, @andrescrz.

I believe we can discuss this with the consultancy.

This makes sense. From the very beginning it was very suspicious that the failing payload was very big. During our discussions, it was on the table that size might have been the culprit, but we initially focused on the formatting issue first.

I'm glad you managed to reproduce and fix this. Well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants