i#6662 public traces: update doc #7139
Conversation
Updates the documentation on Public Google Workload Traces. Gives a description of the new format: the #DR_ISA_REGDEPS synthetic ISA that instructions follow, what TRACE_MARKER_TYPE_* are present or have been modified, what is v2p.textproto. Issue #6662
|
|
||
| \section sec_google_get Getting the Traces | ||
|
|
||
| The Google Workload Traces can be downloaded from: | ||
|
|
||
| - [Google workload trace folder](https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/external-traces) | ||
| - [Google workload trace folder](TODO: add new link to Google Storage Bucket once known) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume we'd use the same bucket? Should we make version_1 and version_2 subdirs? Or just delete v1? Maybe just delete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mhm, I'd keep version 1 in that bucket as is.
I added the deprecated section that says DynamoRIO 11.0 is the last version that will support these traces, so if somebody is still using them, they can still do so with DynamoRIO 11.0.
Can't we use a new bucket? "external_traces_v2"? Do we need a subdir?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's discuss offline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new one could be sthg like console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/external-traces-v2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's right, I created: https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/external-traces-v2 (now empty).
I've added it as link to the new public traces.
I also added a section about deprecated public v1 traces with the old link to them.
I think it might be a good idea to also have DOI for citations? We could make one with https://zenodo.org/ . This way it's easy to track who/how many cite this work.
marker to the list of removed markers.
Updates the documentation on Public Google Workload Traces.
Gives a description of the new format: the #DR_ISA_REGDEPS
synthetic ISA that instructions follow, what TRACE_MARKER_TYPE_*
are present or have been modified, what is v2p.textproto.
Issue #6662