Update sonar-cloud.yml

[guibranco]

User description

📑 Description

Update sonar-cloud.yml

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

---

---

Description

• Enhanced the CI workflow by adding a setup step for Node.js version 22.x.
• Updated the dependency installation command to use npm ci for better consistency.
• Introduced a build step to ensure the project is built before testing.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	sonar-cloud.yml Enhance CI workflow with Node.js setup and build step        .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml Added Node.js setup step for version 22.x. Changed dependency installation command from npm install to npm ci. Introduced a build step with npm run build. +9/-1

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow for Sonar Cloud Analysis
  • Added Node.js version 22 setup
  • Modified dependency installation process
  • Introduced a build step in the CI/CD pipeline

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the sonar-cloud.yml workflow to set up Node.js 22, switch to using npm ci for installing dependencies, and add a separate build step.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes ensure that the workflow uses a specific, up-to-date Node.js version, improve reliability and stability of dependency installation by using npm ci, and add a build step which is essential for ensuring that the latest code is compiled correctly before testing. This helps in maintaining a consistent and reproducible CI environment.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the sonar-cloud.yml file to include Node.js setup and build steps. It also changes the dependency installation to use "npm ci" instead of "npm install".

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Setup Node.js environment	Added a step to set up Node.js version 22 using actions/setup-node@v4. Added a step to build the project using npm run build. Updated dependency installation to use npm ci instead of npm install.	.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Sonar Cloud workflow configuration in the .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml file. The changes include adding Node.js version 22 setup using the actions/setup-node@v4 action, switching from npm install to npm ci for dependency installation, and introducing a new build step that runs npm run build. These modifications aim to optimize the workflow's dependency management and build process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml	- Added Node.js version 22 setup - Replaced npm install with npm ci - Introduced new npm run build step

Possibly related PRs

• Update build.yml #126: Updates Node.js version in a workflow file, similar to the Node.js version 22 setup in this PR

Suggested labels

Review effort [1-5]: 1

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Poem

🐰 A workflow hopping with glee,
Node.js version 22 set free!
npm ci steps so neat,
Build commands making code complete,
Sonar Cloud's rabbit dance of delight! 🚀

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 534db89 and c32aab9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
• GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
• GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]

🔇 Additional comments (3)

.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml (3)

30-31: Verify build script exists

Adding a build step before tests is a good practice as it catches build errors early.

Let's verify that the build script exists in package.json:

✅ Verification successful

Build script verification successful

The build script exists in package.json, confirming that npm run build is a valid command.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the build script exists in package.json
if jq -e '.scripts.build' package.json > /dev/null; then
    echo "build script exists in package.json"
else
    echo "Error: build script not found in package.json"
    exit 1
fi

Length of output: 116

---

28-28: Verify package-lock.json exists

The switch to npm ci is a good practice for CI environments as it ensures reproducible builds and is generally faster than npm install.

Let's verify that package-lock.json exists:

✅ Verification successful

npm ci usage is safe and recommended

The change to npm ci is verified to be safe as package-lock.json exists in the repository. This change will ensure reproducible builds in the CI environment.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if package-lock.json exists
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
    echo "package-lock.json exists"
else
    echo "Error: package-lock.json not found. npm ci requires package-lock.json"
    exit 1
fi

Length of output: 89

---

22-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using Node.js LTS version instead of 22.x

Node.js 22 is currently in development and not yet an LTS version. Using a non-LTS version in CI could lead to stability issues. Additionally, the x in the version number could cause inconsistent builds as new 22.x versions are released.

Consider using the current LTS version (20.x) or wait until Node.js 22 reaches LTS status. Also, pin the exact version number to ensure consistent builds.

       - name: Set up Node.js 22
         uses: actions/setup-node@v4
         with:
-          node-version: 22.x
+          node-version: 20.11.0

Let's verify the latest LTS version:

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[korbit-ai]

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

• You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
• You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
• Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
• Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
• Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

• Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
• Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings

​

Setting	Value
Review Schedule	Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count	10
Automatic PR Descriptions	✅

Issue Categories

​

Category	Enabled
Naming	✅
Database Operations	✅
Documentation	✅
Logging	✅
Error Handling	✅
Systems and Environment	✅
Objects and Data Structures	✅
Readability and Maintainability	✅
Asynchronous Processing	✅
Design Patterns	✅
Third-Party Libraries	✅
Performance	✅
Security	✅
Functionality	✅

Feedback and Support

• Tell us what you think of Korbit
• Schedule a call with our team
• Email us @ [email protected]

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve updating the CI workflow with clear steps.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Use npm ci for installing dependencies to ensure a clean environment It is advisable to use npm ci instead of npm install for CI environments to ensure a clean and reproducible build. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml [27-28] -run: npm install +run: npm ci Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: Using npm ci is crucial for CI environments as it ensures a clean installation based on the lock file, which is essential for reproducibility.	10
	Specify a version tag for the Node.js setup action to ensure stability Consider using a specific version tag for the actions/setup-node action to ensure consistent behavior and avoid potential breaking changes in the future. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml [22-23] - name: Set up Node.js 22 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 + uses: actions/[email protected] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Specifying a version tag for actions is a best practice to avoid unexpected changes in behavior, making this suggestion valuable for stability.	8
Performance	Add caching for node_modules to improve build performance Consider adding a step to cache node_modules to speed up subsequent builds. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml [30-31] +- name: Cache node_modules + uses: actions/cache@v2 + with: + path: node_modules + key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }} - name: Build run: npm run build Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Caching node_modules can significantly improve build times, but this suggestion is not critical as the current setup is functional without it.	7
Possible issue	Verify and adjust the Node.js version to match your project's compatibility requirements Ensure that the Node.js version specified is compatible with your project dependencies to avoid runtime issues. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml [25] -node-version: 22.x +node-version: 18.x Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While checking compatibility is important, the suggestion to change the version from 22.x to 18.x lacks context about the project's actual dependency requirements, making it less impactful.	5

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Using Node.js 22 is risky as it's not yet released and only available as nightly builds. Consider using the current LTS version (Node.js 20) instead for better stability.
• The PR template indicates documentation changes were made, but no documentation updates are visible in the diff. Please include any necessary documentation updates.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

11:52PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:52PM INF 83 commits scanned.
11:52PM INF scan completed in 75.6ms
11:52PM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud