Create deep-source.yml #129
Conversation
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new GitHub workflow file named Sequence diagram for DeepSource workflow executionsequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub
participant WF as Workflow Runner
participant DS as DeepSource
Note over GH,DS: Triggered by push to main, PR, or manual dispatch
GH->>WF: Start workflow
WF->>WF: Checkout code
WF->>WF: Install DeepSource CLI
WF->>WF: Setup Node.js 22
WF->>WF: Install dependencies
WF->>WF: Build project
WF->>WF: Run tests with coverage
WF->>DS: Send coverage report
DS->>DS: Analyze coverage data
DS->>GH: Report analysis results
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow named "Deep Source" has been introduced to the repository. This workflow automates the process of code quality and coverage analysis using DeepSource. It operates on the latest Ubuntu environment, performs code checkout, sets up Node.js version 22, installs dependencies, builds the project, runs tests with coverage, and generates a DeepSource report. The workflow is triggered on pushes to the main branch, pull requests, and can also be manually initiated. Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/M
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
penify-dev
bot
added
the
Review effort [1-5]: 2
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
PR Review 🔍
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Using Node.js 22.x is not recommended for CI pipelines as it's currently unstable. Consider using an LTS version like 20.x instead.
- Please verify that your test coverage output matches the expected 'coverage.xml' format required by DeepSource. Some JavaScript testing frameworks may use different formats by default.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (3)
3-8: Optimize workflow triggers with path filtersConsider adding path filters to the push trigger to run only when relevant files are changed. This will help reduce unnecessary workflow runs.
push: branches: - main + paths: + - '**/*.js' + - '**/*.jsx' + - '**/*.ts' + - '**/*.tsx' + - 'package.json' + - 'package-lock.json'
28-29: Add caching for npm dependenciesAdd caching to speed up the workflow and reduce load on npm servers.
+ - name: Cache dependencies + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: ~/.npm + key: npm-${{ hashFiles('package-lock.json') }} + restore-keys: npm- - name: Install dependencies run: npm ci
26-35: Fix YAML formatting issuesThere are several formatting issues in the file:
- Incorrect indentation at line 26 (should be 18 spaces)
- Trailing spaces at lines 27, 30, 33, and 35
node-version: 22.x - + - name: Install dependencies run: npm ci - + - name: Build run: npm run build - + - name: Test and coverage - run: npm run test:coverage + run: npm run test:coverage🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 33-33: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 35-35: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 33-33: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 35-35: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (1)
10-14: LGTM!The job configuration is well-defined and uses appropriate settings.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
@gstraccini create labels |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (2)
20-21:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity: Avoid piping curl directly to shell
Direct piping of downloaded content to shell is a security risk. Consider downloading the installer first and verifying its checksum.
23-26:⚠️ Potential issueUse LTS version of Node.js
Node.js 22 is not an LTS version and might be unstable. Consider using the latest LTS version (20.x) instead.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (1)
26-35: Fix YAML formatting issuesThere are several formatting issues in the workflow file:
- Incorrect indentation at line 26
- Trailing spaces at lines 27, 30, 33, and 35
Apply this formatting fix:
with: - node-version: 22.x + node-version: 22.x - + run: npm ci - + run: npm run build - + run: npm run test:coverage🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 33-33: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 35-35: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
[warning] 26-26: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 33-33: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 35-35: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
[warning] 12-40: Workflow does not contain permissions
Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
- GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
- GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (2)
34-35: Configure coverage reporting formatThe workflow expects lcov.info format for coverage reporting. Ensure your test configuration generates the correct coverage format.
Let's verify the test coverage configuration:
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 35-35: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
37-40: Verify paths in DeepSource report commandThe command assumes specific paths that might need verification:
./bin/deepsource- Verify if the DeepSource CLI is installed in this location./coverage/lcov.info- Ensure this is the correct path where coverage reports are generatedLet's verify the paths:
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[warning] 12-40: Workflow does not contain permissions
Actions Job or Workflow does not set permissions
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Creating 18 labels and updating 20 labels! 🏷️ |
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs12:11AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:11AM INF 85 commits scanned.
12:11AM INF scan completed in 75.3ms
12:11AM INF no leaks found
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (2)
24-25:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity: Avoid piping curl directly to shell
Direct piping of downloaded content to shell is a security risk. Consider downloading the installer first and verifying its checksum.
27-30:⚠️ Potential issueUse LTS version of Node.js
Node.js 22 is not an LTS version and might be unstable. Consider using the latest LTS version (20.x) instead.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (1)
30-39: Fix YAML formattingThere are some minor YAML formatting issues:
- Incorrect indentation at line 30
- Trailing spaces at lines 31, 34, 37, and 39
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
with: - node-version: 22.x + node-version: 22.x - + run: npm ci - + run: npm run build - + run: npm run test:coverage🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
[error] 31-31: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 34-34: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 37-37: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 39-39: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 18 but found 16
(indentation)
[error] 31-31: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 34-34: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 37-37: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 39-39: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
- GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
- GitHub Check: pixeebot[bot]
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml (5)
3-12: LGTM! Proper permissions configured.The workflow has appropriate triggers and follows the principle of least privilege with explicit permissions.
14-18: LGTM! Well-structured job configuration.The job is properly named and uses the latest Ubuntu runner.
19-23: LGTM! Secure checkout configuration.The checkout step correctly uses the latest version and explicitly references the PR head SHA.
38-39: Configure XML coverage reporter for VitestThe coverage reporter needs to be configured to generate the correct format for DeepSource.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 39-39: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
41-44: Verify coverage report pathPlease verify that
./coverage/lcov.infois the correct path where your test coverage report will be generated.Run this script to check the coverage output directory configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Coverage report path is correctly configured ✅
The path
./coverage/lcov.infomatches Vitest's default coverage directory and the lcov reporter configuration invite.config.ts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check coverage directory configuration jq '.jest,.vitest' package.json rg -l "coverageDirectory.*coverage" --type-add 'config:*.{js,ts,json}' -t configLength of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for test configuration files and coverage-related settings echo "=== Package.json scripts ===" jq '.scripts' package.json echo -e "\n=== Test config files ===" fd -e config.js -e config.ts -e config.json -e rc.js -e rc.json echo -e "\n=== Existing coverage files ===" fd lcov.infoLength of output: 552
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Vitest coverage configuration in vite.config.ts echo "=== Vite config content ===" cat vite.config.ts echo -e "\n=== Search for coverage configuration ===" rg -i "coverage" vite.config.tsLength of output: 911
User description
📑 Description
Create deep-source.yml
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
Description
mainbranch and on pull requests.Changes walkthrough 📝
deep-source.yml
Add DeepSource CI workflow for code analysis.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
Node.js, and running tests with coverage.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add a GitHub Actions workflow named
Deep Sourcefor generating coverage reports using DeepSource on push to the main branch and pull request events.Why are these changes being made?
This change automates the testing and coverage reporting process to ensure code quality and maintainability by utilizing DeepSource's analysis tool. It standardizes the workflow for scanning the codebase for issues, thereby integrating continuous integration practices within the repository.