Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP #233 combine wallets , remotes and copies in a holding object #746

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lastk
Copy link
Contributor

@lastk lastk commented Mar 24, 2019

No description provided.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 24, 2019

@yegor256/z please, pay attention to this pull request

@0crat 0crat added the scope label Mar 24, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 24, 2019

Job #746 is now in scope, role is REV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 24, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@yegor256
Copy link
Collaborator

@lastk this is nice, but it has to be used by all other classes in the project.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 30, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@lastk
Copy link
Contributor Author

lastk commented Mar 30, 2019

@yegor256 I found some references for just wallets and copies ( missing remotes ) in some constructors like here: https://github.com/zold-io/zold/blob/master/lib/zold/commands/diff.rb#L42
in this case, would still be ok passing an home object with an empty remotes? or better leave it as it is.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 2, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #746 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 24.32%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #746      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   33.88%   33.88%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          76       77       +1     
  Lines        3816     3840      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits         1293     1301       +8     
- Misses       2523     2539      +16
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/zold/node/pipeline.rb 32.72% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
lib/zold/node/spread_entrance.rb 33.92% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
lib/zold/remotes.rb 35.71% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
lib/zold/commands/node.rb 17.96% <11.11%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
lib/zold/commands/merge.rb 19.6% <14.28%> (-0.4%) ⬇️
lib/zold/hungry_wallets.rb 26.53% <14.28%> (-0.56%) ⬇️
lib/zold/commands/pull.rb 55.55% <14.28%> (-3.27%) ⬇️
lib/zold/commands/routines/reconcile.rb 34.37% <16.66%> (-1.11%) ⬇️
lib/zold/commands/invoice.rb 36.11% <16.66%> (-1.04%) ⬇️
lib/zold/commands/fetch.rb 28.22% <20%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
... and 5 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 27f64d4...e1517be. Read the comment docs.

@lastk lastk changed the title #233 combine wallets , remotes and copies in a holding object WIP #233 combine wallets , remotes and copies in a holding object Apr 2, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 4, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 9, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@lastk lastk force-pushed the 233_combine_wallets_remotes_and_copies branch 2 times, most recently from 9c949a3 to e1517be Compare April 9, 2019 15:44
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 14, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 19, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 24, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Apr 29, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 4, 2019

@yegor256/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #746; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 5, 2019

This pull request #746 is assigned to @v-kolesnikov/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @yegor256/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be a monetary reward for this job

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants