Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: set smart contracts team as codeowners #228

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

fadeev
Copy link
Member

@fadeev fadeev commented Jan 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated repository code ownership to the Zeta Chain smart contracts team.

@fadeev fadeev requested a review from andresaiello as a code owner January 10, 2025 07:41
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the .github/CODEOWNERS file, updating the repository ownership. The previous owners (@andresaiello, @lucas-janon, and @fadeev) have been replaced with a new collective owner @zeta-chain/smart-contracts. This change indicates a transition in code review and approval responsibilities for the entire repository.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Replaced previous individual owners with @zeta-chain/smart-contracts for all repository files

The modification represents a streamlined approach to repository ownership, consolidating review responsibilities under a single team-based ownership model. This change simplifies the code review process by designating a specific team as the primary stewards of the repository's codebase.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45cfdf4 and 0ba0ac3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fadeev
Copy link
Member Author

fadeev commented Jan 10, 2025

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@fadeev
Copy link
Member Author

fadeev commented Jan 13, 2025

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@fadeev
Copy link
Member Author

fadeev commented Jan 14, 2025

@andresaiello please, review.

@fadeev fadeev marked this pull request as draft January 15, 2025 12:32
@fadeev fadeev self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
@fadeev fadeev marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 12:32
@fadeev
Copy link
Member Author

fadeev commented Jan 15, 2025

@andresaiello please, review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant