Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

boards: adafruit: add initial support for feather m4 express #81081

Merged

Conversation

Terezvent
Copy link
Contributor

@Terezvent Terezvent commented Nov 7, 2024

@Terezvent Terezvent force-pushed the adafruit_feather_m4_express branch 4 times, most recently from 329641a to 0d0eb4b Compare November 7, 2024 17:01
@Terezvent Terezvent changed the title boards: adafruit: add initial support for feather m4 espress boards: adafruit: add initial support for feather m4 express Nov 7, 2024
@nordicjm nordicjm requested review from kartben and removed request for nordicjm November 8, 2024 09:20
boards/adafruit/feather_m4_express/doc/index.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
boards/adafruit/feather_m4_express/board.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
boards/adafruit/feather_m4_express/doc/index.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
The Adafruit Feather M4 Express is a compact, lightweight
ARM development board with an onboard mini NeoPixel, 2 MiB
of SPI flash, charging status indicator and user LEDs, USB
connector, 21 GPIO pins and a small prototyping area.

Signed-off-by: Teresa Zepeda Ventura <[email protected]>
@Terezvent
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @kartben
Could you help me review the changes you requested, please?

Copy link
Collaborator

@kartben kartben left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Terezvent this is great, thanks!

@nashif nashif merged commit 7ec8c8e into zephyrproject-rtos:main Nov 16, 2024
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants