[WIP] GiST support #7
Conversation
zachasme
force-pushed
the
feature-more-operators
branch
2 times, most recently
from
cc89091 to
7835d69
Compare
zachasme
force-pushed
the
feature-more-operators
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8e7d009 to
6c9acd7
Compare
|
How can we help? 🔨 |
|
If I recall correctly, the state of the branch (which hasn't been touched in a year 😮) is that we managed to get GiST and SP-GiST operator classes to compile and run. However, tests either returned wrong results or were significantly slower than no index. There probably is either a logical error or a misimplementation of (SP-)GiST. Help is very much welcomed! The branch should be rebased (or maybe it's easier to simply copy the opclass since so much has changed). Then, we need to figure out what is wrong with our implementation. My implementation is based off the SP-GiST docs and GiST docs but if anyone has some other reference implementation that could be helpful. |
|
Roger that. Let's move the conversation to the linked issue! |
zachasme
force-pushed
the
feature-more-operators
branch
from
6c9acd7 to
6db18d2
Compare
|
Closing in favor of #42. |
We have implemented basic SP-GiST support.
We are going to experiment with regular GiST index support on this branch as well.