Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

subtree-push nightly-2025-01-02 #15

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: subtree_push_automation
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Bumping the toolchain version as part of a git subtree push

current toolchain (nightly-2024-12-02):

  • 1.85.0-nightly (5e1440ae5 2024-12-01)

latest toolchain (nightly-2025-01-02):

  • 1.85.0-nightly (45d11e51b 2025-01-01)

max-niederman and others added 16 commits November 24, 2024 19:42
And pass this to the individual emitters when necessary.
Parse guard patterns

This implements the parsing of [RFC3637 Guard Patterns](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3637-guard-patterns.html) (see also [tracking issue](rust-lang/rust#129967)). This PR is extracted from rust-lang/rust#129996 with minor modifications.

cc `@max-niederman`
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #133567 (A bunch of cleanups)
 - #133789 (Add doc alias 'then_with' for `then` method on `bool`)
 - #133880 (Expand home_dir docs)
 - #134036 (crash tests: use individual mir opts instead of mir-opt-level where easily possible)
 - #134045 (Fix some triagebot mentions paths)
 - #134046 (Remove ignored tests for hangs w/ new solver)
 - #134050 (Miri subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…r paths involving them

When we expand a `mod foo;` and parse `foo.rs`, we now track whether that file had an unrecovered parse error that reached the end of the file. If so, we keep that information around. When resolving a path like `foo::bar`, we do not emit any errors for "`bar` not found in `foo`", as we know that the parse error might have caused `bar` to not be parsed and accounted for.

When this happens in an existing project, every path referencing `foo` would be an irrelevant compile error. Instead, we now skip emitting anything until `foo.rs` is fixed. Tellingly enough, we didn't have any test for errors caused by `mod` expansion.

Fix #97734.
Add AST support for unsafe binders

I'm splitting up #130514 into pieces. It's impossible for me to keep up with a huge PR like that. I'll land type system support for this next, probably w/o MIR lowering, which will come later.

r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@BoxyUwU` and `@lcnr` who also may want to look at this, though this PR doesn't do too much yet
As it happens, lookahead values of 0, 1, and 2 all work fine here, due
to the structure of the code. (Values or 3 or greater cause test
failures.) This commit changes the lookahead to zero because that will
facilitate cleanups in subsequent commits.
It's only ever used with a lookahead of 0, so this commit removes the
lookahead and renames it `peek`.
Because `TokenStreamIter` is a much better name for a `TokenStream`
iterator. Also rename the `TokenStream::trees` method as
`TokenStream::iter`, and some local variables.
`rustc_symbol` is the source of truth for keywords.

rustdoc has its own implicit definition of keywords, via the
`is_doc_keyword`. It (presumably) intends to include all keywords, but
it omits `yeet`.

rustfmt has its own explicit list of Rust keywords. It also (presumably)
intends to include all keywords, but it omits `await`, `builtin`, `gen`,
`macro_rules`, `raw`, `reuse`, `safe`, and `yeet`. Also, it does linear
searches through this list, which is inefficient.

This commit fixes all of the above problems by introducing a new
predicate `is_any_keyword` in rustc and using it in rustdoc and rustfmt.
It documents that it's not the right predicate in most cases.
Overhaul keyword handling

The compiler's list of keywords has some problems.
- It contains several items that aren't keywords.
- The order isn't quite right in a couple of places.
- Some of the names of predicates relating to keywords are confusing.
- rustdoc and rustfmt have their own (incorrect) versions of the keyword list.
- `AllKeywords` is unnecessarily complex.

r? ```@jieyouxu```
The parser pushes a `TokenType` to `Parser::expected_token_types` on
every call to the various `check`/`eat` methods, and clears it on every
call to `bump`. Some of those `TokenType` values are full tokens that
require cloning and dropping. This is a *lot* of work for something
that is only used in error messages and it accounts for a significant
fraction of parsing execution time.

This commit overhauls `TokenType` so that `Parser::expected_token_types`
can be implemented as a bitset. This requires changing `TokenType` to a
C-style parameterless enum, and adding `TokenTypeSet` which uses a
`u128` for the bits. (The new `TokenType` has 105 variants.)

The new types `ExpTokenPair` and `ExpKeywordPair` are now arguments to
the `check`/`eat` methods. This is for maximum speed. The elements in
the pairs are always statically known; e.g. a
`token::BinOp(token::Star)` is always paired with a `TokenType::Star`.
So we now compute `TokenType`s in advance and pass them in to
`check`/`eat` rather than the current approach of constructing them on
insertion into `expected_token_types`.

Values of these pair types can be produced by the new `exp!` macro,
which is used at every `check`/`eat` call site. The macro is for
convenience, allowing any pair to be generated from a single identifier.

The ident/keyword filtering in `expected_one_of_not_found` is no longer
necessary. It was there to account for some sloppiness in
`TokenKind`/`TokenType` comparisons.

The existing `TokenType` is moved to a new file `token_type.rs`, and all
its new infrastructure is added to that file. There is more boilerplate
code than I would like, but I can't see how to make it shorter.
Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

The subtree-push applied cleanly ✅.

Take a moment to review the changes. You'll also want to Run the Diff-Check job.

Diff-Check Job Parameters:

After CI and the Diff-Check job pass this PR should be good to merge!

ytmimi and others added 3 commits January 1, 2025 21:32
Bumping the toolchain version as part of a git subtree push

current toolchain (nightly-2024-12-02):
  - 1.85.0-nightly (5e1440ae5 2024-12-01)

latest toolchain (nightly-2025-01-02):
  - 1.85.0-nightly (45d11e51b 2025-01-01)
@ytmimi ytmimi force-pushed the subtree-push-nightly-2025-01-02 branch from 8428739 to ab98945 Compare January 2, 2025 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants