-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add account password change feature #172
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes aimed at enhancing user account management functionalities. A new asynchronous function, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/pages/SettingsPage.tsx (1)
39-39
: LGTM: Addition of 'Account' to navigation list.The 'Account' entry is correctly added to the
navList
prop, enabling navigation to the new account settings section. This change aligns with the PR objective.Consider if the placement of 'Account' at the beginning of the list is intentional. If not, you might want to adjust the order to maintain consistency with the rendered components or any existing navigation hierarchy.
src/components/Button/Button.tsx (1)
46-46
: LGTM: ButtonProps type updated correctlyThe 'color' property in ButtonProps has been correctly updated to include the new 'info' option, maintaining type safety and consistency with the ButtonStyle object.
Consider extracting the color options into a separate type or constant to improve maintainability. This would make it easier to add or modify color options in the future. For example:
type ButtonColor = 'primary' | 'success' | 'danger' | 'info' | 'toggle' | 'default'; // Then in ButtonProps: color?: ButtonColor;This approach would centralize the color options and make it easier to keep ButtonStyle and ButtonProps in sync.
src/assets/styles/pages/admin_setting_account.scss (1)
285-293
: LGTM with minor formatting suggestion.The new styles for
.change_password_form
are well-structured and align with the PR objective of adding a password change feature. The margins added to.modal_desc
and.input_box
provide appropriate spacing between elements in the form.Consider adjusting the indentation of the new styles to match the rest of the file for consistency. Here's the suggested change:
- .change_password_form { - .modal_desc { - margin-bottom: 8px; - } - - .input_box { - margin-top: 8px; - } - } +.change_password_form { + .modal_desc { + margin-bottom: 8px; + } + + .input_box { + margin-top: 8px; + } +}src/api/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-63
: Enhance type safety with consistent return type annotationsTo improve code readability and type safety, consider adding explicit return type annotations to all exported functions. Some functions already have return types specified, while others don't. Consistency in this area will make the code more maintainable and self-documenting.
Here are a few examples of functions that could benefit from explicit return type annotations:
export async function deleteAccount(username: string, password: string): Promise<void> { // ... existing implementation ... } export async function changePassword(username: string, password: string, newPassword: string): Promise<void> { // ... implementation ... } // Update other functions similarlyThis change will make the expected return types clear for all functions and help catch potential type-related issues earlier in the development process.
src/features/users/Account.tsx (1)
48-51
: Remove unnecessary dependency fromonClose
callbackThe
setIsModalOpen
setter function is stable and does not need to be included in the dependency array ofonClose
.Apply this diff to update the dependency array:
const onClose = useCallback(() => { reset(); setIsModalOpen(false); - }, [reset, setIsModalOpen]); + }, [reset]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- src/api/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/assets/styles/pages/admin_setting_account.scss (1 hunks)
- src/components/Button/Button.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Icons/Icon.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/users/Account.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/users/usersSlice.ts (5 hunks)
- src/pages/SettingsPage.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/features/users/Account.tsx
[error] 111-111: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 137-137: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 155-155: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
src/pages/SettingsPage.tsx (3)
23-23
: LGTM: Import statement for Account component.The import statement for the
Account
component is correctly placed and follows the existing import structure. This addition aligns with the PR objective of implementing the account password change feature.
Line range hint
23-45
: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications to
SettingsPage.tsx
consistently implement the addition of the Account feature, including:
- Importing the Account component
- Adding Account to the navigation list
- Rendering the Account component
These changes directly address the PR objective of adding an account password change feature and enhancing account management functionalities. The implementation appears to be minimal and focused, without disrupting existing features.
To ensure full alignment with the PR objectives, please confirm:
- The Account component includes password change functionality.
- Appropriate validations are in place for password changes.
- The feature is accessible to administrators as mentioned in the linked issue Add basic account action feature #160.
You may want to review the implementation of the
Account
component itself to verify these points.
45-45
: LGTM: Rendering of Account component.The
Account
component is correctly added to the render tree, positioned consistently with the navigation order. This addition directly implements the account management feature described in the PR objectives.To ensure the
Account
component is fully implemented, please run the following script:This script will help verify:
- The existence of the Account component file.
- The basic structure of the Account component.
- The presence of password change functionality within the component.
Please review the results to ensure the component is fully implemented as per the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Account component implementation confirmed.
All verification tests have passed:
- The
Account.tsx
file exists insrc/features/users/
.- The
Account
component is correctly structured.- Password change functionality is implemented within the component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the Account component # Test 1: Check if the Account component file exists fd -t f "Account.(tsx|js|jsx)" src/features/users # Test 2: Inspect the Account component implementation ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export function Account() { $$$ }' # Test 3: Check for password change functionality within the Account component rg -i "password.*change|change.*password" src/features/users/Account.tsxLength of output: 910
src/components/Button/Button.tsx (2)
29-29
: LGTM: New color option added successfullyThe addition of the 'info' color option with the class name 'blue_0' is consistent with the existing structure and naming convention. This enhancement provides more flexibility in UI design without breaking existing functionality.
Line range hint
1-101
: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement new color optionThe modifications to add the 'info' color option have been implemented correctly and consistently throughout the file. These changes align with the PR objectives to enhance the Button component's flexibility. The implementation maintains type safety and doesn't introduce any breaking changes.
To further improve the code:
- Consider the suggestion to extract color options into a separate type or constant for better maintainability.
- Ensure that the new 'info' color option is properly styled in the corresponding CSS file (not shown in this review).
- Update any relevant documentation or storybook examples to showcase the new color option.
To ensure the changes are reflected in the styling, please run the following command:
This will help verify that the new 'info' color option has corresponding styles defined.
src/components/Icons/Icon.tsx (3)
62-62
: LGTM: Import statement for RepeatSVG is correct and consistent.The import statement for
RepeatSVG
is properly formatted and follows the established pattern for icon imports in this file. It maintains consistency with other icon imports and adheres to React component naming conventions.
108-108
: LGTM: Addition of RepeatSVG to svgMap is correct and consistent.The new entry for the
RepeatSVG
icon in thesvgMap
object is properly formatted and consistent with other entries. The key name 'repeat' is descriptive and follows the established naming convention.
Line range hint
62-108
: Verify the purpose of the new RepeatSVG icon.The addition of the
RepeatSVG
icon is implemented correctly and doesn't introduce any breaking changes to the existingIcon
component. The component will now support the 'repeat' icon type seamlessly.However, could you please clarify how this new icon relates to the account password change feature mentioned in the PR objectives? It would be helpful to understand its intended use in the context of this feature.
src/assets/styles/pages/admin_setting_account.scss (1)
285-293
: Changes align well with PR objectives.The addition of the
.change_password_form
styles is focused and minimal, addressing only the new password change feature. These changes align well with the PR objectives of enabling users to update their account passwords. The new styles are properly scoped within the existing.setting_account_page
class, ensuring they don't interfere with other styles.To ensure no unintended style conflicts, run the following command to check for any other occurrences of
.change_password_form
in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Verification successful, no additional occurrences of
.change_password_form
found.The search confirmed that
.change_password_form
exists only insrc/assets/styles/pages/admin_setting_account.scss
, ensuring no unintended style conflicts elsewhere.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of .change_password_form rg --type scss ".change_password_form"Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of .change_password_form in .scss files rg ".change_password_form" --glob "*.scss"Length of output: 119
src/api/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-63
: Summary: Password change feature implemented with room for enhancementsThe implementation of the
ChangePassword
function successfully addresses the main objective of the PR, which is to enable users to update their account passwords. This aligns with the requirements outlined in the linked issue #160 for enhancing account management functionalities.Key points:
- The core functionality for changing passwords is in place.
- The implementation follows the existing pattern of using gRPC for server communication.
- The function is exported, making it available for use in other modules as required.
Suggested improvements:
- Add password validation to ensure security requirements are met.
- Implement error handling for better user experience and easier debugging.
- Rename the function to
changePassword
for consistency with existing naming conventions.- Consider grouping authentication-related functions for better code organization.
- Add consistent return type annotations across all exported functions.
These enhancements will improve the overall quality, security, and maintainability of the code while fully meeting the PR objectives and addressing the requirements from the linked issue.
src/features/users/usersSlice.ts (5)
49-56
: Definition ofchangePassword
state is appropriateThe
changePassword
state is correctly added to theUsersState
interface with the necessary properties for status management and error handling.
86-92
:ChangePasswordFields
type is well-definedThe
ChangePasswordFields
type includes all required fields for the password change functionality, ensuring that necessary data is captured.
114-118
: Initialization ofchangePassword
state is correctThe initial state for
changePassword
is properly set up ininitialState
, which will help in managing the state transitions effectively.
296-324
: Error handling inchangePassword.rejected
action is appropriateThe error handling logic for the
changePassword.rejected
action correctly updates the state based on differentRPCStatusCode
values and provides meaningful error messages to the user.
325-334
: Verify the necessity of logging out the user after a successful password changeIn the
changePassword.fulfilled
case, the user is logged out upon a successful password change by clearing the token and resetting the user state.Please verify if this behavior is intentional and aligns with the desired user experience. Logging out the user after a password change may be a security measure, but it could also disrupt the user workflow if not expected.
src/features/users/Account.tsx (2)
94-94
: Verify the necessity of the hidden username input fieldThe hidden input field for
username
may not be necessary sinceusername
is already available in the component scope.Check if the hidden input field is required for form submission or autofill purposes. If not, consider removing it to simplify the form.
Would you like assistance in refactoring this part of the code?
125-128
: Ensure the password validation regex meets security requirementsThe regex pattern used for password validation should be thoroughly tested to ensure it correctly enforces the intended password policy.
Run the following script to test the regex against various password inputs:
This script will help verify that the regex pattern accepts valid passwords and rejects those that don't meet the criteria.
✅ Verification successful
Password validation regex correctly enforces security requirements.
- The regex accurately accepts passwords with 8-30 characters, including at least one letter, one number, and one special character.
- Invalid cases correctly reject passwords that do not meet one or more of these criteria.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Test the password regex pattern with different inputs. # The regex pattern from the code regex='^(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[0-9])(?=.*[~`!?@#$%^&*()\-_+={}[\]|\\;\:'\"<>,./])(?:[a-zA-Z0-9~`!?@#$%^&*()\-_+={}[\]|\\;\:'\"<>,./]{8,30})$' # Test cases passwords=( 'Password123!' # Valid 'password' # Invalid: no numbers or special characters '12345678' # Invalid: no letters or special characters 'Pass1234' # Invalid: no special characters 'Pass!@#' # Invalid: no numbers 'P@ssw0rd' # Valid ) # Test the passwords for pwd in "${passwords[@]}"; do if [[ $pwd =~ $regex ]]; then echo "Valid: $pwd" else echo "Invalid: $pwd" fi doneLength of output: 275
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Test the password regex pattern with different inputs. # The regex pattern from the code, using double quotes and escaping where necessary regex="^(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[0-9])(?=.*[~\`!?@#\$%^&*()\-_+={}[\]|\\;:'\"<>,./])(?:[a-zA-Z0-9~\`!?@#\$%^&*()\-_+={}[\]|\\;:'\"<>,./]{8,30})$" # Test cases passwords=( "Password123!" # Valid "password" # Invalid: no numbers or special characters "12345678" # Invalid: no letters or special characters "Pass1234" # Invalid: no special characters "Pass!@#" # Invalid: no numbers "P@ssw0rd" # Valid ) # Test the passwords for pwd in "${passwords[@]}"; do if [[ $pwd =~ $regex ]]; then echo "Valid: $pwd" else echo "Invalid: $pwd" fi doneLength of output: 1558
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Test the password regex pattern with different inputs using grep for better regex support. # The regex pattern from the code, using double quotes and escaping where necessary regex="^(?=.*[a-zA-Z])(?=.*[0-9])(?=.*[~\`!?@#\$%^&*()\-_+={}[\]|\\;:'\"<>,./]).{8,30}$" # Test cases passwords=( "Password123!" # Valid "password" # Invalid: no numbers or special characters "12345678" # Invalid: no letters or special characters "Pass1234" # Invalid: no special characters "Pass!@#" # Invalid: no numbers "P@ssw0rd" # Valid ) echo "Using regex: $regex" # Test the passwords using grep -P for Perl-compatible regex for pwd in "${passwords[@]}"; do echo -n "Testing '$pwd': " if echo "$pwd" | grep -Pq "$regex"; then echo "Valid" else echo "Invalid" fi doneLength of output: 1701
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/features/users/usersSlice.ts (3)
86-91
: LGTM:ChangePasswordFields
type addedThe new
ChangePasswordFields
type correctly defines the necessary fields for a password change operation. IncludingconfirmPassword
is a good practice for ensuring user intent.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of this type and its fields for better code documentation.
160-165
: LGTM:changePassword
thunk action creator addedThe
changePassword
thunk action creator is correctly implemented usingcreateAppThunk
. It properly calls theapi.changePassword
function with the necessary parameters.Consider adding a comment explaining why
confirmPassword
is not passed to the API call, to clarify that it's intentionally omitted and used only for client-side validation.
296-334
: LGTM: Comprehensive state handling forchangePassword
thunkThe
extraReducers
for thechangePassword
thunk are well-implemented, covering pending, rejected, and fulfilled states. The error handling is thorough, addressingUNAUTHENTICATED
andINVALID_ARGUMENT
status codes appropriately.Consider adding a comment explaining why the user is logged out upon successful password change (lines 328-333). This behavior might not be immediately obvious to other developers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/api/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/users/Account.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/users/usersSlice.ts (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/api/index.ts
- src/features/users/Account.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/features/users/usersSlice.ts (3)
49-56
: LGTM: NewchangePassword
property added toUsersState
The new
changePassword
property in theUsersState
interface is well-structured and consistent with other similar properties. It correctly includes fields for status tracking, success indication, and error handling specific to password changes.
114-118
: LGTM: Initial state forchangePassword
addedThe initial state for the
changePassword
property is correctly defined and consistent with other similar properties in the state. It properly initializes theisSuccess
,status
, anderror
fields.
Line range hint
1-365
: Summary: Password change feature successfully implementedThe changes in this file successfully implement the password change feature as outlined in the PR objectives and linked issue #160. The implementation:
- Adds necessary state management for password changes
- Implements a thunk action creator for the password change operation
- Handles various states and error scenarios comprehensively
- Maintains consistency with existing code patterns and Redux best practices
These changes enhance the account management capabilities as requested, allowing users to update their passwords securely. The implementation aligns well with the broader context of improving account management features in the dashboard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution.
What this PR does / why we need it?
This feature allows users to update their account passwords. It includes necessary validations to ensure password security and correctness.
change-password.mov
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant tickets?
Fixes #160
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores