Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding nuSMEFT and its RG running. #115

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jackypheno
Copy link
Collaborator

@jackypheno jackypheno commented Oct 27, 2024

A new EFT, nuSMEFT, is added to Wilson, which allows performing renormalization group running within nuSMEFT based on the anomalous dimensions computed in the two papers: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12109 and https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.04441.

The major change is the addition of EFTevolve class, which allows RG running in nuSMEFT(it is general enough to work for SMEFT and WET). For the moment this has not been used for SMEFT and WET to maintain backward compatibility.

In addition, we also introduced yukawa_scale_in and gauge_higgs_scale_in as new options of set_option() which allow the user to input the Yukawa, gauge, and Higgs couplings at new physics scale, for the RG running within nuSMEFT. For nuSMEFT, it is necessary to input the 'G_n' because it's a model-dependent quantity. Its default value is set to zero. In the future, for SMEFT, these new options will allow us to study the individual effects of gauge and Yukawa running.

@peterstangl This PR should address the backward compatibility issue, maybe we can close #114, once this is finalized.
The current PR depends on wcxf/wcxf-bases#14 (we need to merge it first to pass all checks).

Jason Aebischer (@jasonaebischerGIT), Tejhas Kapoor (@tejhaskapoor), Jacky Kumar

@jackypheno jackypheno changed the title All changes related to nuSMEFT Adding nuSMEFT and its RG running. Oct 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant