Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DESeq2 feedback #1011

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 15, 2023
Merged

DESeq2 feedback #1011

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 15, 2023

Conversation

siebrenf
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@siebrenf siebrenf marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2023 14:19
Comment on lines 78 to 85
###### Count dispersions
For each design contrast, you can specify which samples should be used to estimate the count dispersions by giving them a label.
This can be used to exclude failed samples from the analysis.
In general, more samples improves the dispersion estimate.

In contrast `stages_3_1` all samples will be used to estimate the count dispersions, including sample_3 and sample_4.

In contrast `conditions_knockout_wildtype` sample_5 and sample_6 will **not** be used to estimate the count dispersions.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sample 5 and 6 are not taken along because they are empty right? Perhaps explain that clearer.

Copy link
Member

@Maarten-vd-Sande Maarten-vd-Sande left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very clear!

@siebrenf siebrenf merged commit 4908ef0 into develop Sep 15, 2023
2 checks passed
@siebrenf siebrenf deleted the deseq2_docs branch September 15, 2023 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants