-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor!: run data generators only for visible columns #6798
Open
ugur-vaadin
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
refactor-schedule-renderers-to-run-for-visible-cols
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+406
−62
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2fb7739
refactor: schedule renderers to only run for visible columns
ugur-vaadin 361ccde
fix: remove unnecessary line
ugur-vaadin 4128359
fix: send items only once to the client
ugur-vaadin 9959a86
refactor: patch data generator instead of scheduling renderer
ugur-vaadin c359c25
chore: remove extra empty lines
ugur-vaadin 982bb82
fix: override all methods when patching data generator
ugur-vaadin 337eab2
test: revert unit test asserions
ugur-vaadin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added a fix and the test for it to handle this case. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regarding the utility of this change: This sort of moves the performance issue to a different use-case, which is showing and hiding columns. In that case it now needs to reload all data whenever a single column is made visible. Previously it would load everything up front, but then doesn't have to reload everything if you show a single column.
What is everyone's thought on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In theory, hiding and unhiding columns shouldn't need to result in a data provider call, but only the data generators should need to be rerun for the already loaded items.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm pretty sure that whoever created this issue wouldn't expect additional data provider calls as part of this change.
Since there's a trade-off, maybe it could be turned into an option. Though it's a bit challenging to communicate what this even does.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This nasty prototype method in Grid does the job without additional data provider calls, but it requires reflection. I hope there's a better way (maybe storing the value in Grid.setRequestedRange):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be related: #6713