Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CTCPをCCPとTCPに分離 #209

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

meltingrabbit
Copy link
Collaborator

@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit commented Jan 24, 2022

概要

CTCPをCCPとTCPに分離

Issue

詳細

  • CTCPCommonTlmCmdPacket, CommonTlmPacket, CommonCmdPacket に分離した
    • 現在,すべてが TCP だが,それは今後直す

検証結果

既存のCIがすべて通ればOK

影響範囲

ここでは限定的.次に続くPRで大きな影響が出てくる見込み

補足

@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request priority::high priorityg high labels Jan 24, 2022
@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit self-assigned this Jan 24, 2022
Docs/Core/communication.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit force-pushed the feature/divide_ctcp_to_ccp_and_ctp branch from ba65db7 to 247a7c6 Compare January 24, 2022 12:31
@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit changed the title WIP: CTCPをCCPとTCPに分離 ¥CTCPをCCPとTCPに分離 Jan 24, 2022
@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit changed the title ¥CTCPをCCPとTCPに分離 CTCPをCCPとTCPに分離 Jan 24, 2022
TlmCmd/packet_handler.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@yngyu yngyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

遅れてすいません、OKです

@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit merged commit 5da66e8 into develop Jan 25, 2022
@meltingrabbit meltingrabbit deleted the feature/divide_ctcp_to_ccp_and_ctp branch January 25, 2022 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request priority::high priorityg high
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants