-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/format contracts prettier plugin solidity #840
Feature/format contracts prettier plugin solidity #840
Conversation
workspaces Resolves: ubiquity#839
Please, provide QA, which pattern is following? |
@molecula451 sure, please check the QA demo below: I am changing one contract, one test file, two places each and prettier is fixing the layout during pre-commit stage. prettier_qa_demo.mp4 |
That's crazy to me that you're using vim without syntax highlighting. For future reference, you do not need to request a review from me in this repository as most of the work involves Solidity and I am not a Solidity expert. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be honest I couldn't make much sense of what exactly was happening in your video, but the code seems fine.
🤣
All right, will remember that. You were set as a default when I opened the pull request. |
Merging with 2 approvals. |
@gitcoindev please, wait for my full review as I am working on other sections of the repo |
All right, though this one was already closed. Fortunately you should be able to easily rebase your branch on top of development as it does not affect existing code much and should not change anything in your pull request. |
no worries, but the best ideal is to have everyones feedback before it gets merged, unless! and unless! the implementation is absolutely clear to everyones eyes |
Resolves #839
format:all
Plus fix prettier output for IUbiquityGovernance.sol