Add 'how to add a bioconda recipe and biocontainer' tutorial

[jfy133]

Opening this already so people can shame me into finishing it (will be slow going for a while because baby).

I'm basically cleaning up these notes: https://hackmd.io/@jfy133/ryXNpa9Op

At the end I'll make a fast TL;DR version too probably

[pmenzel]

When rendering the website, the background is still not white. I don't know if that can be fixed in the markup here or it would be easier to add a white background to the original graphic.

[jfy133]

I'm not sure I follow, the image is a SVG, and there is no background - and the background of the iamge in your sceenshot still looks seamless with the background of the blog, e.g. if I open in my image viewer...

Do you mean in the main boxes (one time setup, for each tool) etc?

[samuell]

Here mostly just commenting on some typos and language fixes.

[Wytamma]

Fantastic work @jfy133! I successfully submitted pango-collapse to Bioconda 🎉

I've add a few minor comments/suggestions. Only major gripe would be that it's very long and I feel like I didn't need it all i.e. I was adding a package from PYPI so most of the R/build.sh steps were irrelevant. I'm not sure if there's a way to break this up into package types? e.g. only show some sections if they are applicable. (the TLDR is good tho)

[Wytamma]

Suggested change

	greyskull <pypi/cran> > <toolname>/meta.yaml
	greyskull <pypi/cran> <toolname> > <toolname>/meta.yaml

[Wytamma]

greyskull pypi: error: the following arguments are required: pypi_packages

[Wytamma]

also once I ran greyskull it added a bunch of \u0000 values to the end of the meta.yaml file which then failed linting.

[jfy133]

Interesting... I also don't get the 'following arguments' error, not \u000 with the new command I will be pushing... maybe you can try that

[jfy133]

Fantastic work @jfy133! I successfully submitted pango-collapse to Bioconda 🎉

I've add a few minor comments/suggestions. Only major gripe would be that it's very long and I feel like I didn't need it all i.e. I was adding a package from PYPI so most of the R/build.sh steps were irrelevant. I'm not sure if there's a way to break this up into package types? e.g. only show some sections if they are applicable. (the TLDR is good tho)

Woohoo thank you!

Addressed all the minor comments :)

Indeed, I did wonder if it would make sense to split it up into three posts: adding a recipe, debugging, and updating, what do you think?

I see what you mean about the build.sh steps not being relevant, but I don't think there is sufficient difference between the types for it to make sense (there is basically python/(some) R, and everything else)...

I guess I could see if the <details> HTML works for teh build.sh step... and hide all of that section. Would that help? Taht said it's the debugging section that is the longest...

[jfy133]

Unfortunately the <details> trick didn't work as the markdown formatting gets lost :(

I'm erring on keeping build.sh though as it's actually very common outside of Python. Still happy to consider moving the debugging section into a separate post.

[pmenzel]

It's time to merge it!