-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing unit tests on Faker queries #24540
Closed
+59
−50
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ | |
package io.trino.plugin.faker; | ||
|
||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList; | ||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.concurrent.GuardedBy; | ||
import io.airlift.slice.Slice; | ||
import io.trino.spi.TrinoException; | ||
|
@@ -59,8 +60,6 @@ | |
import java.util.List; | ||
import java.util.Map; | ||
import java.util.Optional; | ||
import java.util.stream.Collectors; | ||
import java.util.stream.Stream; | ||
|
||
import static com.google.common.base.Verify.verify; | ||
import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList; | ||
|
@@ -223,8 +222,9 @@ public synchronized void renameTable(ConnectorSession session, ConnectorTableHan | |
FakerTableHandle handle = (FakerTableHandle) tableHandle; | ||
SchemaTableName oldTableName = handle.schemaTableName(); | ||
|
||
TableInfo oldInfo = tables.get(oldTableName); | ||
tables.remove(oldTableName); | ||
tables.put(newTableName, tables.get(oldTableName)); | ||
tables.put(newTableName, oldInfo); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I also fixed this in #24242, please rebase on master. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. okay, will rebase |
||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
|
@@ -234,13 +234,18 @@ public synchronized void setTableProperties(ConnectorSession session, ConnectorT | |
SchemaTableName tableName = handle.schemaTableName(); | ||
|
||
TableInfo oldInfo = tables.get(tableName); | ||
Map<String, Object> newProperties = Stream.concat( | ||
oldInfo.properties().entrySet().stream() | ||
.filter(entry -> !properties.containsKey(entry.getKey())), | ||
properties.entrySet().stream() | ||
.filter(entry -> entry.getValue().isPresent())) | ||
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue)); | ||
tables.put(tableName, oldInfo.withProperties(newProperties)); | ||
ImmutableMap.Builder updatedProperties = ImmutableMap.<String, Object>builder().putAll(oldInfo.properties()); | ||
if (properties.containsKey(TableInfo.NULL_PROBABILITY_PROPERTY)) { | ||
double nullProbability = (double) properties.get(TableInfo.NULL_PROBABILITY_PROPERTY) | ||
.orElseThrow(() -> new IllegalArgumentException("The null_probability property cannot be empty")); | ||
updatedProperties.put(TableInfo.NULL_PROBABILITY_PROPERTY, nullProbability); | ||
} | ||
if (properties.containsKey(TableInfo.DEFAULT_LIMIT_PROPERTY)) { | ||
long defaultLimit = (long) properties.get(TableInfo.DEFAULT_LIMIT_PROPERTY) | ||
.orElseThrow(() -> new IllegalArgumentException("The default_limit property cannot be empty")); | ||
updatedProperties.put(TableInfo.DEFAULT_LIMIT_PROPERTY, defaultLimit); | ||
} | ||
tables.put(tableName, oldInfo.withProperties(updatedProperties.buildOrThrow())); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The commit message is misleading when it changes the product code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Went with it, because unit tests forced the fixes on product code.
Do you have any suggestions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The commit message should say what behavior was fixed. If there are any additional tests, you could extract them into a separate commit. This could make reviewing easier, but it's optional.
I assume you started with the intention of only adding tests, and this is expressed in the current commit message. Then noticed the code needs to be fixed, so you did that to make the tests passed. You should update the commit message to reflect the end result.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the discussion, I think it better to extract it to separate commits. Closing this issue for now.