-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Additional esm package changes #3684
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If Jared is confident about the jexl changes ... or confident that the tests sufficiently cover those changes, I approve this PR as is.
@@ -1,19 +1,23 @@ | |||
import jexlCore from 'jexl'; | |||
import * as ts from '@terascope/utils'; | |||
import { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are some substantial changes here in this file and not a whole lot of test coverage:
So I am a little concerned that the scope of the changes might not be covered by tests. I'm not going to stop reviewing to consider this in detail at this point but if you want to look back at this a little more closely and consider whether the test coverage is really sufficient that would be excellent.
should either mock the http response or refactor the code | ||
to make it easier to mock | ||
*/ | ||
xdescribe('save', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should remember to fix this.
will refactor in another PR as that could be cascading changes.
eslint-config
package, the refactor requires a library update that would also force a config change which will have an impact on this codebase as well as our others as well