Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More API functions #8

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

More API functions #8

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

cr1901
Copy link
Contributor

@cr1901 cr1901 commented Apr 25, 2020

This PR adds the following functions, along with remarks:

The last two functions I intend to implement are: ftdi_set_bitmode and disable_bitbang, which are duals of each other. This is worth a PR in and of itself, but once it's done, #1, #2 can be closed and safe-ftdi can be deprecated! :)

Copy link
Owner

@tanriol tanriol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a number of comments.


pub fn read_pins(&mut self) -> Result<u8> {
let mut pins : u8 = 0;
let pins_ptr = std::slice::from_mut(&mut pins).as_mut_ptr();
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the slice actually needed here? Why not just ffi::ftdi_read_pins(self.context, &mut pins)?


pub fn set_baudrate(&mut self, baudrate : u32) -> Result<()> {
// TODO: libftdi1 will multiply baud rates in bitbang mode
// by 4. This leads to UB if baudrate >= INT_MAX/4.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd just add the corresponding assert here to avoid the possible UB.

@@ -21,6 +21,24 @@ pub enum Interface {
Any,
}

pub enum FlowControl {
Disable,
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Naming: having this one as the only verb in this list looks weird. I'd prefer something like Disabled / Off

impl Into<i32> for FlowControl {
fn into(self) -> i32 {
match self {
FlowControl::Disable => 0x0,
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we should import these constants into libftdi1-sys.

XonXoff
}

impl Into<i32> for FlowControl {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd prefer to have this as a private method for now. The specific codes used by FTDI for this should not be part of our API.

@@ -119,6 +119,26 @@ impl Device {
}
}

pub fn usb_close(mut self) -> Result<Builder> {
Copy link
Owner

@tanriol tanriol Apr 25, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have an actual use case for this, or do you do this just as it was in #2? I'd expect that allocating memory for the context is cheaper than actually opening the device, so the optimization is minimal. In other words, I'd probably prefer to drop this one.


use super::ffi;

#[derive(Debug, Error)]
pub enum Error {
#[error("failed to initialize the ftdi context")]
InitFailed,
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't used anywhere, is it?

}
}

pub fn set_baudrate(&mut self, baudrate : u32) -> Result<()> {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All our API needs docs, but this function probably the most for now. Does it include the "but the actual baud rate is 16 times higher" property in bitbang, assuming we implement it sooner or later (and do we want it to)? What accuracy does it guarantee? Can we somehow get back the actual baud rate configured? What happens to the baud rate what we switch modes once we support that?

@cr1901 cr1901 mentioned this pull request May 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants