Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sv1-mining-device lib #1249

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jbesraa
Copy link
Contributor

@jbesraa jbesraa commented Nov 14, 2024

Resolves #1245

@jbesraa jbesraa force-pushed the 2024-11-12-sv1-mining-device-lib branch from c33c014 to 9546fe3 Compare November 14, 2024 13:09
@jbesraa jbesraa marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 13:09
Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch2024-11-12-sv1-mining-device-lib
Testbedsv2
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
client_sv2_handle_message_common📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
45.27
(+0.83%)
47.47
(95.38%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
73.25
(-2.53%)
86.47
(84.72%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.67
(+0.09%)
14.76
(99.42%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
267.41
(-0.38%)
319.05
(83.82%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
610.47
(+3.03%)
694.59
(87.89%)
client_sv2_open_channel📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
148.44
(+1.01%)
152.19
(97.53%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
288.98
(+0.82%)
314.28
(91.95%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
380.92
(+0.96%)
416.81
(91.39%)
client_sv2_setup_connection📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
171.68
(+5.30%)
190.58
(90.08%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
465.14
(-0.58%)
583.85
(79.67%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
984.94
(+1.81%)
1,085.87
(90.71%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch2024-11-12-sv1-mining-device-lib
Testbedsv1
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
client-submit-serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,709.60
(-0.73%)
7,800.37
(86.02%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,607.90
(-0.79%)
8,817.85
(86.28%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,175.40
(-0.71%)
9,338.14
(87.55%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
867.59
(-1.48%)
1,002.50
(86.54%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
672.81
(-1.04%)
808.60
(83.21%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
244.39
(-1.39%)
266.06
(91.86%)
client-sv1-get-authorize/client-sv1-get-authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
155.82
(-0.99%)
164.69
(94.62%)
client-sv1-get-submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,543.50
(+0.12%)
7,702.35
(84.95%)
client-sv1-get-subscribe/client-sv1-get-subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
274.47
(-1.40%)
310.58
(88.37%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
738.97
(-0.69%)
875.43
(84.41%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
596.95
(-1.29%)
697.52
(85.58%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
202.35
(-2.04%)
228.38
(88.60%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch2024-11-12-sv1-mining-device-lib
Testbedsv2
🚨 5 ALERTS: Threshold Boundary Limits exceeded!
BenchmarkMeasure
Units
ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserializeEstimated Cycles
estimated cycles
📈 plot
🚨 alert
🚷 threshold
27,758.00
(+0.84%)
27,738.40
(100.07%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserializeInstructions
instructions
📈 plot
🚨 alert
🚷 threshold
10,645.00
(+0.63%)
10,640.58
(100.04%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserializeL1 Accesses
accesses
📈 plot
🚨 alert
🚷 threshold
15,503.00
(+0.71%)
15,489.22
(100.09%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserializeL2 Accesses
accesses
📈 plot
🚨 alert
🚷 threshold
92.00
(+13.06%)
90.17
(102.03%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserializeL2 Accesses
accesses
📈 plot
🚨 alert
🚷 threshold
87.00
(+17.04%)
85.35
(101.94%)
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkEstimated CyclesBenchmark Result
estimated cycles
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
estimated cycles
(Limit %)
InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
instructions
(Limit %)
L1 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
L2 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
RAM AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
client_sv2_handle_message_common📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,103.00
(+0.51%)
2,203.69
(95.43%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
473.00
(-0.04%)
488.74
(96.78%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
733.00
(-0.36%)
757.84
(96.72%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8.00
(+45.25%)
14.29
(55.97%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
38.00
(+0.06%)
41.09
(92.47%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,170.00
(-0.43%)
8,289.80
(98.55%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,137.00
(-0.03%)
2,143.08
(99.72%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,160.00
(-0.03%)
3,170.53
(99.67%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
36.00
(+1.10%)
42.27
(85.16%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
138.00
(-0.75%)
140.97
(97.89%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,293.00
(+0.23%)
6,387.63
(98.52%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,750.00
(-0.04%)
1,767.13
(99.03%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,548.00
(-0.22%)
2,576.18
(98.91%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
21.00
(+23.36%)
24.81
(84.65%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
104.00
(+0.01%)
106.98
(97.21%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14,736.00
(+0.02%)
14,970.78
(98.43%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,694.00
(-0.02%)
4,711.13
(99.64%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,751.00
(-0.11%)
6,782.89
(99.53%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
50.00
(+14.78%)
53.68
(93.15%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
221.00
(-0.27%)
227.87
(96.99%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚨 view alert
🚷 view threshold
27,758.00
(+0.84%)
27,738.40
(100.07%)
📈 view plot
🚨 view alert
🚷 view threshold
10,645.00
(+0.63%)
10,640.58
(100.04%)
📈 view plot
🚨 view alert
🚷 view threshold
15,503.00
(+0.71%)
15,489.22
(100.09%)
📈 view plot
🚨 view alert
🚷 view threshold
92.00
(+13.06%)
90.17
(102.03%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
337.00
(+0.58%)
341.46
(98.69%)
client_sv2_open_channel📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,417.00
(+0.42%)
4,617.64
(95.65%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,461.00
(-0.01%)
1,476.74
(98.93%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,157.00
(-0.11%)
2,185.44
(98.70%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11.00
(+21.90%)
17.83
(61.69%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
63.00
(+0.51%)
68.54
(91.91%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14,028.00
(-0.25%)
14,460.05
(97.01%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,064.00
(-0.00%)
5,079.74
(99.69%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,323.00
(-0.03%)
7,353.23
(99.59%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
39.00
(+10.86%)
43.49
(89.68%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
186.00
(-0.79%)
198.91
(93.51%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
22,866.00
(+0.89%)
22,910.36
(99.81%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,040.00
(+0.26%)
8,074.92
(99.57%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11,686.00
(+0.17%)
11,755.49
(99.41%)
📈 view plot
🚨 view alert
🚷 view threshold
87.00
(+17.04%)
85.35
(101.94%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
307.00
(+1.12%)
312.07
(98.37%)
client_sv2_setup_connection📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,689.00
(+0.10%)
4,772.91
(98.24%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,502.00
(-0.01%)
1,517.74
(98.96%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,274.00
(-0.19%)
2,299.53
(98.89%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.00
(+50.21%)
15.81
(88.53%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
67.00
(-0.60%)
69.85
(95.92%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
16,168.00
(-0.04%)
16,472.86
(98.15%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,963.00
(-0.00%)
5,978.74
(99.74%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,658.00
(-0.06%)
8,692.83
(99.60%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
46.00
(+14.82%)
53.79
(85.51%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
208.00
(-0.43%)
216.66
(96.00%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
35,708.00
(+0.44%)
35,748.11
(99.89%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14,888.00
(+0.27%)
14,905.91
(99.88%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
21,878.00
(+0.31%)
21,916.69
(99.82%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
99.00
(+6.47%)
114.60
(86.39%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
381.00
(+0.45%)
384.77
(99.02%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch2024-11-12-sv1-mining-device-lib
Testbedsv1
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkEstimated CyclesBenchmark Result
estimated cycles
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
estimated cycles
(Limit %)
InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
instructions
(Limit %)
L1 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
L2 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
RAM AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
get_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,391.00
(-0.76%)
8,831.12
(95.02%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,689.00
(-1.56%)
3,892.26
(94.78%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,156.00
(-1.89%)
5,461.67
(94.40%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.00
(+39.43%)
12.88
(77.66%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
91.00
(+0.66%)
96.20
(94.60%)
get_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
95,449.00
(+0.01%)
96,156.89
(99.26%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
59,346.00
(-0.21%)
59,819.08
(99.21%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
85,219.00
(-0.23%)
85,920.46
(99.18%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
44.00
(-2.91%)
65.24
(67.44%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
286.00
(+2.19%)
289.49
(98.79%)
get_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,872.00
(-1.77%)
8,387.46
(93.85%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,765.00
(-2.42%)
2,971.86
(93.04%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,847.00
(-2.88%)
4,154.24
(92.60%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.00
(+16.59%)
20.75
(67.46%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
113.00
(-0.95%)
120.16
(94.04%)
serialize_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
12,214.00
(-0.48%)
12,655.24
(96.51%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,266.00
(-0.99%)
5,462.16
(96.41%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,324.00
(-1.26%)
7,623.12
(96.08%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
12.00
(+32.76%)
15.80
(75.97%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
138.00
(+0.42%)
143.69
(96.04%)
serialize_deserialize_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
24,378.00
(-1.23%)
25,289.95
(96.39%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
9,838.00
(-0.53%)
10,056.39
(97.83%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
13,888.00
(-0.54%)
14,212.11
(97.72%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
33.00
(-5.10%)
44.26
(74.56%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
295.00
(-2.07%)
315.93
(93.37%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
30,114.00
(-0.66%)
30,799.90
(97.77%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
12,015.00
(-0.55%)
12,226.77
(98.27%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
16,999.00
(-0.64%)
17,320.80
(98.14%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
61.00
(+9.40%)
68.40
(89.18%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
366.00
(-0.91%)
382.11
(95.79%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
126,441.00
(-0.03%)
127,204.51
(99.40%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
73,200.00
(-0.12%)
73,700.75
(99.32%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
104,911.00
(-0.15%)
105,671.37
(99.28%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
106.00
(-1.19%)
133.89
(79.17%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
600.00
(+0.64%)
605.56
(99.08%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
27,498.00
(-1.17%)
28,652.33
(95.97%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
9,584.00
(-0.65%)
9,791.00
(97.89%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
13,543.00
(-0.75%)
13,852.09
(97.77%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
68.00
(+7.03%)
76.16
(89.29%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
389.00
(-1.78%)
417.32
(93.21%)
serialize_deserialize_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
115,163.00
(-0.07%)
115,998.39
(99.28%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
68,060.00
(-0.07%)
68,515.55
(99.34%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
97,653.00
(-0.09%)
98,358.92
(99.28%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
65.00
(+3.32%)
78.84
(82.45%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
491.00
(+0.00%)
499.69
(98.26%)
serialize_deserialize_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
22,880.00
(-1.56%)
24,080.39
(95.02%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,143.00
(-0.72%)
8,347.67
(97.55%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11,465.00
(-0.77%)
11,759.57
(97.50%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
36.00
(-3.68%)
44.77
(80.42%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
321.00
(-2.32%)
349.22
(91.92%)
serialize_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
99,838.00
(-0.02%)
100,534.34
(99.31%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
61,408.00
(-0.17%)
61,864.38
(99.26%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
88,078.00
(-0.21%)
88,768.16
(99.22%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
49.00
(+4.05%)
65.65
(74.64%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
329.00
(+1.38%)
334.08
(98.48%)
serialize_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11,317.00
(-0.68%)
11,767.50
(96.17%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,118.00
(-1.50%)
4,317.65
(95.38%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,707.00
(-1.91%)
6,009.75
(94.96%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
16.00
(+24.57%)
20.60
(77.68%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
158.00
(+0.31%)
164.14
(96.26%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

@Shourya742 Shourya742 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nits and a few follow-ups. Everything else looks good.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
[package]
name = "sv1-mining-device"
name = "sv1_mining_device"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It makes sense to keep this consistent with other crates in similar roles. I'm not sure if we've published this crate, but if we have, we should deprecate the previous version.

Copy link
Collaborator

@plebhash plebhash Nov 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this crate has not yet been published to crates.io, so it's still not too late to change things

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 on consistency for naming patterns

@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ keywords = ["stratum", "mining", "bitcoin", "protocol"]

# See more keys and their definitions at https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html

[lib]
name = "sv1_mining_device"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The name field can be removed since it's already defined in the [package] section. However, if we want to keep the original package name and use a different library name, including the name field in [lib] makes sense.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is true, however we have been following this same pattern with every roles

in case we decide to change this, IMO it should be a separate PR doing this in a consistent way across all roles

arguably cosmetic and therefore low prio IMHO

@@ -69,8 +67,8 @@ impl Client {
/// the information from `sender_share`, it is formatted as a `v1::client_to_server::Submit`
/// and then serialized into a json message that is sent to the Upstream via
/// `sender_outgoing`.
pub(crate) async fn connect(client_id: u32) {
let stream = std::sync::Arc::new(TcpStream::connect(ADDR).await.unwrap());
pub async fn connect(client_id: u32, upstream_addr: std::net::SocketAddr) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
pub async fn connect(client_id: u32, upstream_addr: std::net::SocketAddr) {
pub async fn connect(client_id: u32, upstream_addr: SocketAddr) {

std::net::SocketAddr can be added to the import statement above.

const ADDR: &str = "127.0.0.1:34255";
Client::connect(
80,
std::net::SocketAddr::from_str(ADDR).expect("Invalid upstream address"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
std::net::SocketAddr::from_str(ADDR).expect("Invalid upstream address"),
SocketAddr::from_str(ADDR).expect("Invalid upstream address"),

std::net::SocketAddr can be added to the import statement above.

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
# This file is automatically @generated by Cargo.
# It is not intended for manual editing.
version = 3
version = 4
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this breaks MSRV

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I highly recommend locking SRI development setup to Rust 1.75.0

that's what I did with my setup when the same thing happened to me

Comment on lines +293 to +309
pub async fn start_sv2_mining_device(pool_address: SocketAddr) {
tokio::spawn(async move {
mining_device::connect(
pool_address.to_string(),
Some(
Secp256k1PublicKey::from_str("9auqWEzQDVyd2oe1JVGFLMLHZtCo2FFqZwtKA5gd9xbuEu7PH72")
.unwrap(),
),
None,
None,
0,
Some(0.1),
)
.await;
});
tokio::time::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(3)).await;
}
Copy link
Collaborator

@plebhash plebhash Nov 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like this is leaking from #1252

@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ once_cell = "1.19.0"
network_helpers_sv2 = { path = "../roles-utils/network-helpers", features =["with_tokio","with_buffer_pool"] }
pool_sv2 = { path = "../pool" }
roles_logic_sv2 = { path = "../../protocols/v2/roles-logic-sv2" }
sv1_mining_device = { path = "../test-utils/sv1-mining-device" }
mining_device = { path = "../test-utils/mining-device" }
Copy link
Collaborator

@plebhash plebhash Nov 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like this is leaking from #1252

@@ -282,3 +282,28 @@ pub async fn start_template_provider(tp_port: u16) -> TemplateProvider {
template_provider.generate_blocks(16);
template_provider
}

pub async fn start_sv1_mining_device(pool_address: SocketAddr) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's try to be consistent with #1234

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also, pool_address is a legacy naming convention that's a bit misleading IMO

I would call this upstream_address

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create library for mining-device-sv1
3 participants