-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add format idempotency test #285
test: add format idempotency test #285
Conversation
It looks like the latest Rust toolchain introduced some new static analysis warnings. We'll work on fixing the source and we can rebase all affected PRs once it merges. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just two nits, otherwise this looks pretty great! Plus I learned a new word, idempotency 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pending @a-frantz's suggestions, looks good
You should be good to rebase your changes on the |
8d2ac3f
to
a853679
Compare
a853679
to
7f2508e
Compare
I have a fix for the failing Windows test (we're not properly tripping the line endings in commands and multiline strings, leaving behind a trailing Once my fix PR merges, we can rebase this PR and it should hopefully go green. |
We can now rebase this on |
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thrasher <[email protected]>
d762772
to
3c79015
Compare
@Scott8440 thanks again for this contribution! |
Thanks for finishing the PR! |
Expands format tests to also test idempotency -
format(format(source)) == format(source)
Addresses #278