Code

[EnderLocke]

added cfb var rankingsType to allow for Composite or 247 rankings to be pulled. defaults to composite.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced player rankings retrieval with a new parameter to specify ranking type ("Composite" or "247").
• Bug Fixes
  • Improved error handling for invalid ranking types in player rankings.
• Chores
  • Updated project version from 2.0.0 to 2.0.4 in package.json.

[vercel]

@EnderLocke is attempting to deploy a commit to the sportsdataverse Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[sweep-ai]

Hey @EnderLocke, here is an example of how you can ask me to improve this pull request:

@Sweep Add unit tests for the `getRecruits` function that verify:
1. The correct URL is constructed when rankingsType is set to 'Composite'
2. The correct URL is constructed when rankingsType is set to '247'
3. An error is thrown when an invalid rankingsType is provided

📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the cfb.service.js file, enhancing the getPlayerRankings method by adding a new parameter, rankingsType, which allows specification of the type of rankings to retrieve. The method's logic is updated to conditionally set the baseUrl based on this parameter and to throw an error for invalid types. Additionally, the package.json file is updated, reflecting a version increment from 2.0.0 to 2.0.4, indicating minor improvements.

Changes

File	Change Summary
app/services/cfb.service.js	Updated getPlayerRankings method to include new parameter rankingsType and adjusted logic accordingly. Minor formatting changes made.
package.json	Version updated from 2.0.0 to 2.0.4.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
New rankings hop in, bright as day.
With a twist and a turn,
The methods now learn,
To fetch scores in a brand new way! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

app/services/cfb.service.js (1)

181-183: Enhance error message with valid options.

Consider making the error message more helpful by including the valid ranking types.

-            throw new Error("Invalid rankings type");
+            throw new Error('Invalid rankings type. Valid options are: "Composite" or "247"');

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7830979 and 47a56b2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• app/services/cfb.service.js (2 hunks)
• package.json (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• package.json

🔇 Additional comments (3)

app/services/cfb.service.js (3)

155-155: LGTM: Parameter documentation and signature changes are well-implemented.

The new rankingsType parameter is properly documented and added to the method signature with the correct default value of "Composite".

Also applies to: 166-167

---

176-183: LGTM: URL construction logic is clear and correct.

The implementation properly handles both ranking types by directing requests to the appropriate endpoints:

• Composite rankings: .../CompositeRecruitRankings
• 247 rankings: .../recruitrankings

---

Line range hint 155-183: Verify documentation updates.

The code changes look good, but please ensure this new functionality is documented in the repository's README or documentation, helping users understand how to use the new rankingsType parameter.