[draft] use mini_portile 2.8.5.rc2 to simplify extconf #405
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-try-new-mini-portile
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d81cf40
to
1788708
Compare
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-try-new-mini-portile
branch
8 times, most recently
from
9ab0347
to
45ce55f
Compare
flavorjones
changed the title
Because we're about to mess around with CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS.
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-try-new-mini-portile
branch
3 times, most recently
from
7532dad
to
1fa1a61
Compare
flavorjones
changed the title
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
flavorjones-try-new-mini-portile
branch
from
1fa1a61
to
ae5c139
Compare
flavorjones
changed the title
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Simplifying the extconf by using the new
mkmf_configfeature in mini_portile 2.8.5