Added Multi-Asic Handling for test_gnmi_configdb_full_01 TC #15572
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
Summary: For Multi-Asic devices,
test_gnmi_configdb_full_01
TC isn't using asic specific namespace, due to which PORT keys received fromget_interface_status
& one inconfig_db
are not in sync.Fixes # (issue)
Checks whether DUT is multi-asic or not; if yes, then generates configuration based on the asic namespace which contains the PORT key returned by
get_inerface_status
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
ApplyPatchDb
API has to be provided, Issue linkHow did you do it?
Checks whether DUT is multi-asic or not; if yes, then generates configuration based on the asic namespace which contains the PORT key returned by
get_inerface_status
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation