-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add RPL Hop-by-Hop option (RFC 6553) #3998
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3998 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.95% 81.94% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 331 331
Lines 76647 76664 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 62813 62823 +10
- Misses 13834 13841 +7
|
b8eb122
to
6a8a25e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. Could you explain us what the parsing of the sub-TLV should be?
The RFC says that there are no sub-TLV's defined in that RFC.
I hope this answers your question. |
Hi ! Would you mind rebasing against master? Thanks |
6a8a25e
to
f6b28ca
Compare
f6b28ca
to
f42a4ed
Compare
f42a4ed
to
4a85ff8
Compare
@thvdveld the linting issues will appear in the |
@guedou Thank you! |
Very sorry for the delay ! |
Checklist:
cd test && ./run_tests
ortox
)This adds support for the RPL Option, defined in RFC 6553, which is used in the Hop-by-Hop options.