Create test for prop

[buzmakov]

We definitely should add test to prop in our test suite.
@samoylv could you suggest me parameters how to run the test without downloading big hdf5 with pulse (may be use small Gaussian beam?)

[samoylv]

I will do it ASAP, probably tomorrow. A guess for KB case : 4.96 keV Gaussian, 0.5 fs pulse duration, 5 urad FWHM divergence

…

On 23 Dec 2016 11:06 p.m., "Alexey Buzmakov" ***@***.***> wrote: We definitely should add test to prop in our test suite. @samoylv <https://github.com/samoylv> could you suggest me parameters how to run the test without downloading big hdf5 with pulse (may be use small Gaussian beam?) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#103>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABxXKbRij3IuHwhmIp4cU2qT4KoVwrJCks5rLCmygaJpZM4LVCkT> .

[samoylv]

For day 1 case the same source parameters as for samples/beamlines/s1_spb*. BTW one can try the same source for KB as well

…

On 24 Dec 2016 9:12 a.m., "Ljuba Samoilova" ***@***.***> wrote: I will do it ASAP, probably tomorrow. A guess for KB case : 4.96 keV Gaussian, 0.5 fs pulse duration, 5 urad FWHM divergence On 23 Dec 2016 11:06 p.m., "Alexey Buzmakov" ***@***.***> wrote: > We definitely should add test to prop in our test suite. > @samoylv <https://github.com/samoylv> could you suggest me parameters > how to run the test without downloading big hdf5 with pulse (may be use > small Gaussian beam?) > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#103>, or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABxXKbRij3IuHwhmIp4cU2qT4KoVwrJCks5rLCmygaJpZM4LVCkT> > . >

[samoylv]

the following prop tests one can use:

• made of samples/beamlines/S1_SPB_CRL_mirrors

• made of samples/beamlines/S1_SPB_KB_mirrors, see issue create S1 KB beamline in samples/ #104

[CFGrote]

see new unittest/* under prop