-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrated commit_represent to S3Represent #1182
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
modules/s3db/req.py
Outdated
""" | ||
table = current.s3db.req_commit | ||
if row.type == 1: | ||
return "%s - %s" % (table.site_id.represent(row.site_id), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes no difference with S3Represent if you call other represents per-row.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should call the bulk-method of the same (!) represent instances once during lookup_rows for /all/ values.
That will store the representations in the instance, so that when you call them per-row in represent_row, they wouldn't be looked up again.
""" | ||
|
||
table = current.s3db.req_commit | ||
super(req_CommitRepresent, self).__init__() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This constructor does basically nothing - so should be removed.
This is the right concept - but a sloppy implementation of it ;) You should always test your code before submitting a PR - and this code can not work, so you either didn't test it, or you ignored that it doesn't work ;) |
Actually @nursix I did tried to test it, but I think they way I tested it is wrong, sorry for that. |
@anurag-ks - generally no problem to ask for feedback on the concept by tagging me in a comment to your commit before submitting a PR. But for a PR, stuff should be working. You could try to write a unit test for this (even if just as an exercise) - this would give you immediate feedback while refactoring things. |
@nursix just a doubt, these represent classes/functions are used for custom rendering of data values for data-tables or exporting data, right ? But on enabling the |
for req/commit there is no 'commit_id' field, there is an 'id' field which in other places would be seen as a commit_id |
yes |
Okay so |
A unit test would create a test req_commit record, and then run req_CommitRepresent against the record ID. Then check whether the return value is correct, and finally remove the test record. That's all there is to it, nothing fancy. |
There are over 500 examples of unit tests in modules/unit_tests and plenty of documentation for the Python unittest module. It's not rocket science - the trick is just to understand what you're trying to prove with the test and implement a valid test. |
And I said that with the unittest only to spare you the effort of digging for a case where it is visible, because I understood that you couldn't find one. In fact, there may not be one ;) |
No description provided.