Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #196 from joshtriplett/macro-implements
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
macro-improvements: Update based on coordination with wg-macros
  • Loading branch information
@joshtriplett
joshtriplett authored Dec 18, 2024
2 parents a5e5919 + 2885de6 commit b61f222
Showing 1 changed file with 31 additions and 16 deletions.
47 changes: 31 additions & 16 deletions src/2025h1/macro-improvements.md
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
| Metadata | |
|----------|---------------|
| Owner(s) | @joshtriplett |
| Teams | [lang] |
| Teams | [lang], [wg-macros] |
| Status | Proposed |

## Summary
Expand All @@ -18,10 +18,7 @@ features, to encourage crate authors to try them and provide feedback, and to
plan transitions within the ecosystem.

The scope of this goal is an arc of many related RFCs that tell a complete
story. The scope of this goal does not encompass the full implementation work,
though I commit to spending time iterating on the design with potential
implementers, and to shepherding and handling procedural matters (e.g.
stabilization reports) as needed.
story, as well as the implementation of the first few steps.

## Motivation

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -54,8 +51,8 @@ their dependencies.
### The next 6 months

Over the next 6 months, I'll propose RFCs to improve the current state of
declarative (`macro_rules!`) macros, and work to get those RFCs accepted. Those
RFCs together will enable:
declarative (`macro_rules!`) macros, and work with @eholk and @vincenzopalazzo
to get those RFCs implemented. Those RFCs together will enable:

- Using `macro_rules!` to define attribute macros (`#[attr]`)
- Using `macro_rules!` to define derive macros (`#[derive(Trait)]`)
Expand All @@ -77,9 +74,10 @@ language. I expect these to reach pre-RFC form and be suitable for discussion
at RustWeek in May 2025, and hopefully reach consensus, but I do not expect
them to be fully accepted or shipped in the next 6 months.

There is already a wg-macros team. I've spoken with @eholk on that team about
revitalizing that team, and considering policy and potential delegation from
[lang], in a similar spirit to wg-const-eval, t-types, and t-opsem.
In addition, as part of this goal, I intend to work with @eholk and
@vincenzopalazzo to revitalize the wg-macros team, and evaluate potential
policies and delegations from [lang], in a similar spirit to wg-const-eval,
t-types, and t-opsem.

Much as with the const eval system, I expect this to be a long incremental
road, with regular improvements to capabilities and simplicity. Crate authors
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -131,20 +129,34 @@ could reserve such syntax in all editions.

| Task | Owner(s) or team(s) | Notes |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Discussion and moral support | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| Propose discussion session at RustWeek | @joshtriplett | |
| Inside Rust blog post on attribute/derive macros | @joshtriplett | |
| Inside Rust blog post on additional capabilities | @joshtriplett | |
| Policy decision | ![Team][] [lang] | Discussed with @eholk; lang would decide whether to delegate specific matters to wg-macros |
| Policy decision | ![Team][] [lang] [wg-macros] | Discussed with @eholk and @vincenzopalazzo; lang would decide whether to delegate specific matters to wg-macros |

### Design for `macro_rules!` attributes/derives
### `macro_rules!` attributes

| Task | Owner(s) or team(s) | Notes |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------|-------|
| Author/revise/iterate RFCs | @joshtriplett | |
| Prioritized nominations | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| RFC decision | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| Implementation of RFC | @eholk, @vincenzopalazzo | |
| Iterate on design as needed | @joshtriplett | |
| Inside Rust blog post on attribute macros | @joshtriplett | |
| Process feedback from crate authors | @joshtriplett | |
| Author stabilization report (if ready) | @joshtriplett | |
| Stabilization decision | ![Team][] [lang] | |

### `macro_rules!` derives

| Task | Owner(s) or team(s) | Notes |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------|-------|
| Author/revise/iterate RFCs | @joshtriplett | |
| Prioritized nominations | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| RFC decision | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| Implementation of RFC | @eholk, @vincenzopalazzo | |
| Iterate on design as needed | @joshtriplett | |
| Inside Rust blog post on derive macros | @joshtriplett | |
| Process feedback from crate authors | @joshtriplett | |
| Author stabilization report (if ready) | @joshtriplett | |
| Stabilization decision | ![Team][] [lang] | |

Expand All @@ -155,11 +167,14 @@ could reserve such syntax in all editions.
| Author initial RFC | @joshtriplett | |
| Design meeting | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| RFC decision | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| Implementation of RFC | @eholk, @vincenzopalazzo | |
| Iterate on design as needed | @joshtriplett | |
| Inside Rust blog post on additional capabilities | @joshtriplett | |
| Process feedback from crate authors | @joshtriplett | |
| Author stabilization report (if ready) | @joshtriplett | |
| Stabilization decision | ![Team][] [lang] | |
| Support lang experiments for fragment fields | @joshtriplett | |
| Author small RFCs for further fragment fields | @joshtriplett | |
| RFC decision | ![Team][] [lang] [wg-macros] | |

### Design for macro metavariable constructs

Expand Down

0 comments on commit b61f222

Please sign in to comment.