Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic setting of params in speckle filter #204

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: ros2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonbinney
Copy link
Contributor

Done previously by berend-kupers, but removed during code review because we thought it needed a separate node inside the filter. Here we use the params_interface_ member variable of the filter base class instead of creating a new node.

The callback needs to be post_set_params and not on_set_params because the changes haven't been finalized yet when on_set_params is called.

Done previously by berend-kupers, but removed during code review because
we thought it needed a separate node inside the filter. Here we use the
params_interface_ member variable of the filter base class instead of
creating a new node.

The callback needs to be post_set_params and not on_set_params because
the changes haven't been finalized yet when on_set_params is called.
@jonbinney
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests fail on humble because the parameter callback interface was different than - there was no separate "post" set params then. We'll need to either branch for humble or use preprocessor conditionals to decide which interface to compile for. I'll take another look at this later in the week.

@jonbinney
Copy link
Contributor Author

Builds now, but i want to add a test of the parameter setting before I trust it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant