Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flexible schema mapping POC #3635

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Hook up basic SG and weaver

a240bec
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Draft

Add flexible schema mapping POC #3635

Hook up basic SG and weaver
a240bec
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL succeeded Jul 10, 2024 in 6s

6 new alerts

New alerts in code changed by this pull request

  • 6 notes

See annotations below for details.

View all branch alerts.

Annotations

Check notice on line 612 in Realm/Realm.SourceGenerator/ClassBuilders/RealmObjectCodeBuilder.cs

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 629 in Realm/Realm.SourceGenerator/ClassBuilders/RealmObjectCodeBuilder.cs

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 651 in Realm/Realm.SourceGenerator/ClassBuilders/RealmObjectCodeBuilder.cs

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 667 in Realm/Realm.SourceGenerator/ClassBuilders/RealmObjectCodeBuilder.cs

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 683 in Realm/Realm.SourceGenerator/ClassBuilders/RealmObjectCodeBuilder.cs

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.

Check notice on line 759 in Realm/Realm.SourceGenerator/ClassBuilders/RealmObjectCodeBuilder.cs

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missed ternary opportunity Note

Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.