Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add info to §1. Design elements and principles, that specification does not define any value validation #134

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Add info to §1. Design elements and principles, that specification does not define any value validation #134

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
7e67275
Added a sentence about not defining any validation for values
k00ni Nov 28, 2018
f426935
Mini code nice up
k00ni Nov 28, 2018
b97605b
Update interface-spec.html based on vhf proposal
vhf Jan 23, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions interface-spec.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ <h2>Design elements and principles</h2>
</li>
<li>Should allow "upgrading" a plain object into a fully functional triple</li>
<li>Interfaces may have additional implementation specific properties.</li>
<li>
We don't define any validation of given values (e.g. IRI, URI, CURIE).
If an implementation enforces valid values, it should state details prominent for the user.
k00ni marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
</li>
</ul>

<p>
Expand Down