fix(scan): add compliance info inside finding

[pedrooot]

Description

This pull request includes several changes to improve the provider model names, update the scan method, and enhance the handling of compliance frameworks and checks metadata. The most important changes include fixing typos in model names, updating the scan method to use None as the default value for custom_checks_metadata, and incorporating bulk compliance frameworks and checks metadata.

Provider Model Names Fixes:

• docs/developer-guide/provider.md: Corrected typos in provider model names from ProvierSessionModel, ProvierIdentityModel, and ProvierOutputOptionsModel to ProviderSessionModel, ProviderIdentityModel, and ProviderOutputOptionsModel respectively. [1] [2]

Scan Method Updates:

• prowler/lib/scan/scan.py: Changed the default value of custom_checks_metadata from an empty dictionary to None in the scan method.

Compliance Frameworks and Checks Metadata:

• prowler/lib/scan/scan.py: Added logic to load bulk compliance frameworks and get bulk checks metadata for the provider, then update the checks metadata with the compliance framework specification.
• prowler/lib/scan/scan.py: Updated the scan method to use the ProviderOutputOptions instance for generating findings output.

Checklist

• Are there new checks included in this PR? Yes / No
  • If so, do we need to update permissions for the provider? Please review this carefully.
• Review if the code is being covered by tests.
• Review if code is being documented following this specification https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.md#38-comments-and-docstrings
• Review if backport is needed.

License

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[github-actions]

You can check the documentation for this PR here -> Prowler Documentation

[jfagoagas]

Instead of doing this two times: one here and another one during the __init__ maybe you can store it in the class. What do you think?