Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

paper: Update to citations #2620

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: paper_2024
Choose a base branch
from
Open

paper: Update to citations #2620

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jackiekazil
Copy link
Member

@jackiekazil jackiekazil commented Jan 15, 2025

Make updates to do two citations. It is a hard exercise to limit what is selected because of the breadth and depth that Mesa has applied.

Removed:

  • title={Putting renewable energy auctions into action--An agent-based model of onshore wind power auctions in Germany}
  • title={Uncertainty in boundedly rational household adaptation to environmental shocks},

The list of citations felt like it was repetitive when it came to themes of climate change, energy, and markets, so I removed the lower-ranking ones to try to create a more unique list.

Added:

  • Sars cov-2 because there are multiple applications in SIR modeling and biological/medical modeling - we needed to have something in there.
  • EdgeSimPy - because it is 2023 & has seems to have steam. It is also representative of the application from a technological application

Both of the ones I added also have code online associated with them.

From my last assessment of Mesa citations, significant areas include Health/Medical, Energy policy everything (because of EU regulatory policy that impacted markets), Climate change/management and disasters, technical-social applications (security, w3 applications), biological, ecological, and evolutionary.

^^ Noting this, does the current list represent Mesa's various applications? I would like to know if it still skews too heavily on the infrastructure and/or disaster/instability sides. We could add more, but then it feels too long. Thoughts?

Part of #2559.

@jackiekazil jackiekazil requested a review from EwoutH January 15, 2025 04:50
@EwoutH EwoutH requested a review from quaquel January 15, 2025 08:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant