Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Java 17 Upgrade #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Java 17 Upgrade #25

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

imjalpreet
Copy link
Member

Related Issue: prestodb/presto#23788

airbase/pom.xml Outdated
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
<dep.packaging.version>0.163</dep.packaging.version>

<!-- Dependency versions that should be the same everywhere. -->
<dep.guice.version>4.2.2</dep.guice.version>
<dep.guice.version>5.0.1</dep.guice.version>
Copy link

@aaneja aaneja Oct 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be upgraded to 6.0.0 ? Since we use javax.Inject in Presto this may be the highest version we can go for now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to @aaneja
hi @imjalpreet is the build ok with 6.0.0? thanks!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for missing this comment earlier. I've upgraded Guice to 6.0.0, and thanks @ZacBlanco for validating the build.

Copy link

@ZacBlanco ZacBlanco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are the changes we are currently running in tests for dual 8/17 support and it seems to work well

@tdcmeehan tdcmeehan merged commit 4b4ca3d into prestodb:master Jan 8, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants