Add Overlap stub

[Pennek]

Still need input on how tags should look

[MegaApplePi]

Temporarily blocking for now. I want to see the general game plan and other specifics in #3143 first before jumping the gun on this.

You also mentioned about something needing input on how tags should look. Do you mean that stub: true part?

[Pennek]

no problem for the blocking. these take little effort.

yes the stub. I want that cleared up before pushing these forward, since we dont have a consensus on how to add them for now. god i cant spell

and im unsure how random yaml tags that aren't implemented actually affect the wiki. maybe it would be better to put something in the footer somehow

[cl8n]

for now it's probably best to do what Loctav suggested, add a note at the bottom saying this is a stub. I don't think the "stub: true" thing is ever going to turn into a web feature cuz this is starting to get pretty redundant with all of these marker: true tags that have similar effects (see conversation with Venix earlier today)

[cl8n]

@MegaApplePi this would be 1. from #3143 (comment) , and even if that were never to be completed i dont think adding these would hurt anything

all that comes to mind for me is that we may need to revisit how indices and Sitemap display this kind of stuff.

[MegaApplePi]

Here are some notes on what was discussed through discord regarding the stub mark:

---

For now, we'll mark stubs with an html comment to help identify them in the future. If you think a stub can be further expanded, you could also include the note that clayton wrote at the bottom.