-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
persist region leader #1253
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
persist region leader #1253
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ message Region { | |||
bool is_in_flashback = 7; | |||
// The start_ts that the current flashback progress is using. | |||
uint64 flashback_start_ts = 8; | |||
Peer leader = 9; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's better to add a new protobuf message in pdpb.proto that wraps metapb.Region
and metapb.Peer
for better extensibility.
metapb.Region
must only include states that need to be persisted in TiKV side, so "leader" should not be added here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It will cause breaking changes on the PD side. BTW, I think the purpose of metapb.Region are not the same on PD and TiKV.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, store leader
in region meta is a little weird from the perspective of TiKV. Can PD store a separate key value for leader info?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
leader
won't assign any value on the TiKV side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know, if there is no other better solution. I can accept reluctantly.
The purpose of this PR is that we want to persist the leader information on the PD side so that if the PDs are reloaded, it won't affect the leader distribution in the cluster with a large number of regions. Because the heartbeat may be not processed in time and there will be redundant scheduling.
Besides, the region cache can get the leader ASAP.