Workflow is a finite-state-machine-inspired API for modeling and interacting with what we tend to refer to as 'workflow'.
A lot of business modeling tends to involve workflow-like concepts, and the aim of this library is to make the expression of these concepts as clear as possible, using similar terminology as found in state machine theory.
So, a workflow has a state. It can only be in one state at a time. When a workflow changes state, we call that a transition. Transitions occur on an event, so events cause transitions to occur. Additionally, when an event fires, other arbitrary code can be executed, we call those actions. So any given state has a bunch of events, any event in a state causes a transition to another state and potentially causes code to be executed (an action). We can hook into states when they are entered, and exited from, and we can cause transitions to fail (guards), and we can hook in to every transition that occurs ever for whatever reason we can come up with.
Now, all that's a mouthful, but we'll demonstrate the API bit by bit with a real-ish world example.
Let's say we're modeling article submission from journalists. An article is written, then submitted. When it's submitted, it's awaiting review. Someone reviews the article, and then either accepts or rejects it. Here is the expression of this workflow using the API:
class Article
include Workflow
workflow do
state :new do
event :submit, :transitions_to => :awaiting_review
end
state :awaiting_review do
event :review, :transitions_to => :being_reviewed
end
state :being_reviewed do
event :accept, :transitions_to => :accepted
event :reject, :transitions_to => :rejected
end
state :accepted
state :rejected
end
end
Nice, isn't it!
Let's create an article instance and check in which state it is:
article = Article.new
article.accepted? # => false
article.new? # => true
You can also access the whole current_state object including the list
of possible events and other meta information:
article.current_state
=> #<Workflow::State:0x7f1e3d6731f0 @events={
:submit=>#<Workflow::Event:0x7f1e3d6730d8 @action=nil,
@transitions_to=:awaiting_review, @name=:submit, @meta={}>},
name:new, meta{}
Now we can call the submit event, which transitions to the :awaiting_review state:
article.submit!
article.awaiting_review? # => true
Events are actually instance methods on a workflow, and depending on the state you're in, you'll have a different set of events used to transition to other states.
It is also easy to check, if a certain transition is possible from the
current state . article.can_submit? checks if there is a :submit
event (transition) defined for the current state.
gem install workflow
Alternatively you can just download the lib/workflow.rb and put it in the lib folder of your Rails or Ruby application.
Workflow gem does not work with some (but very widespread) Ruby 1.9 builds due to a known bug in Ruby 1.9. Either compile your Ruby 1.9 from source or comment out some lines in workflow (reduces functionality).
After installation or downloading of the library you can easily try out all the example code from this README in irb.
$ irb
require 'rubygems'
require 'workflow'
Now just copy and paste the source code from the beginning of this README file snippet by snippet and observe the output.
The best way is to use convention over configuration and to define a method with the same name as the event. Then it is automatically invoked when event is raised. For the Article workflow defined earlier it would be:
class Article
def reject
puts 'sending email to the author explaining the reason...'
end
end
article.review!; article.reject! will cause a state transition, persist the new state
(if integrated with ActiveRecord) and invoke this user defined reject
method.
You can also define event handler accepting/requiring additional arguments:
class Article
def review(reviewer = '')
puts "[#{reviewer}] is now reviewing the article"
end
end
article2 = Article.new
article2.submit!
article2.review!('Homer Simpson') # => [Homer Simpson] is now reviewing the article
The old way, using a block is still supported but deprecated:
event :review, :transitions_to => :being_reviewed do |reviewer|
# store the reviewer
end
We've noticed, that mixing the list of events and states with the blocks invoked for particular transitions leads to a bumpy and poorly readable code due to a deep nesting. We tried (and dismissed) lambdas for this. Eventually we decided to invoke an optional user defined callback method with the same name as the event (convention over configuration) as explained before.
Workflow library can handle the state persistence fully automatically. You
only need to define a string field on the table called workflow_state
and include the workflow mixin in your model class as usual:
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
include Workflow
workflow do
# list states and transitions here
end
end
On a database record loading all the state check methods e.g.
article.state, article.awaiting_review? are immediately available.
For new records or if the workflow_state field is not set the state
defaults to the first state declared in the workflow specification. In
our example it is :new, so Article.new.new? returns true and
Article.new.approved? returns false.
At the end of a successful state transition like article.approve! the
new state is immediately saved in the database.
You can change this behaviour by overriding persist_workflow_state
method.
meuble contributed a solution for using custom persistence column easily, e.g. for a legacy database schema:
class LegacyOrder < ActiveRecord::Base
include Workflow
workflow_column :foo_bar # use this legacy database column for
# persistence
end
Single table inheritance is also supported. Descendant classes can either inherit the workflow definition from the parent or override with its own definition.
If you do not use a relational database and ActiveRecord, you can still
integrate the workflow very easily. To implement persistence you just
need to override load_workflow_state and
persist_workflow_state(new_value) methods. Next section contains an example for
using CouchDB, a document oriented database.
Tim Lossen implemented support for remodel / redis key-value store.
We are using the compact couchtiny library here. But the implementation would look similar for the popular couchrest library.
require 'couchtiny'
require 'couchtiny/document'
require 'workflow'
class User < CouchTiny::Document
include Workflow
workflow do
state :submitted do
event :activate_via_link, :transitions_to => :proved_email
end
state :proved_email
end
def load_workflow_state
self[:workflow_state]
end
def persist_workflow_state(new_value)
self[:workflow_state] = new_value
save!
end
end
Please also have a look at the full source code.
You can integrate with Mongoid following the example above for CouchDB, but there is a gem that does that for you (and includes extensive tests): workflow_on_mongoid
You can easily reflect on workflow specification programmatically - for the whole class or for the current object. Examples:
article2.current_state.events # lists possible events from here
article2.current_state.events[:reject].transitions_to # => :rejected
Article.workflow_spec.states.keys
#=> [:rejected, :awaiting_review, :being_reviewed, :accepted, :new]
Article.workflow_spec.state_names
#=> [:rejected, :awaiting_review, :being_reviewed, :accepted, :new]
# list all events for all states
Article.workflow_spec.states.values.collect &:events
You can also store and later retrieve additional meta data for every state and every event:
class MyProcess
include Workflow
workflow do
state :main, :meta => {:importance => 8}
state :supplemental, :meta => {:importance => 1}
end
end
puts MyProcess.workflow_spec.states[:supplemental].meta[:importance] # => 1
The workflow library itself uses this feature to tweak the graphical representation of the workflow. See below.
We already had a look at the declaring callbacks for particular workflow
events. If you would like to react to all transitions to/from the same state
in the same way you can use the on_entry/on_exit hooks. You can either define it
with a block inside the workflow definition or through naming
convention, e.g. for the state :pending just define the method
on_pending_exit(new_state, event, *args) somewhere in your class.
If you want to be informed about everything happening everywhere, e.g. for
logging then you can use the universal on_transition hook:
workflow do
state :one do
event :increment, :transitions_to => :two
end
state :two
on_transition do |from, to, triggering_event, *event_args|
Log.info "#{from} -> #{to}"
end
end
Please also have a look at the advanced end to end example.
If you want to halt the transition conditionally, you can just raise an
exception in your transition event handler.
There is a helper called halt!, which raises the
Workflow::TransitionHalted exception. You can provide an additional
halted_because parameter.
def reject(reason)
halt! 'We do not reject articles unless the reason is important' \
unless reason =~ /important/i
end
The traditional halt (without the exclamation mark) is still supported
too. This just prevents the state change without raising an
exception.
You can check halted? and halted_because values later.
The whole event sequence is as follows:
* before_transition
* event specific action
* on_transition (if action did not halt)
* on_exit
* PERSIST WORKFLOW STATE, i.e. transition
* on_entry
* after_transition
I am frequently asked if it's possible to represent multiple "workflows" in an ActiveRecord class.
The solution depends on your business logic and how you want to structure your implementation.
One solution can be to do it on the class level and use a class
hierarchy. You can use single table inheritance so there is only
single orders table in the database. Read more in the chapter "Single
Table Inheritance" of the ActiveRecord documentation.
Then you define your different classes:
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
include Workflow
end
class SmallOrder < Order
workflow do
# workflow definition for small orders goes here
end
end
class BigOrder < Order
workflow do
# workflow for big orders, probably with a longer approval chain
end
end
Another solution would be to connect different workflows to object instances via metaclass, e.g.
# Load an object from the database
booking = Booking.find(1234)
# Now define a workflow - exclusively for this object,
# probably depending on some condition or database field
if # some condition
class << booking
include Workflow
workflow do
state :state1
state :state2
end
end
# if some other condition, use a different workflow
You can also encapsulate this in a class method or even put in some ActiveRecord callback. Please also have a look at the full working example!
You can generate a graphical representation of your workflow for documentation purposes. S. Workflow::create_workflow_diagram.
The workflow library was originally written by Ryan Allen.
The version 0.3 was almost completely (including ActiveRecord integration, API for accessing workflow specification, method_missing free implementation) rewritten by Vladimir Dobriakov keeping the original workflow DSL spirit.
Credit: Michael (rockrep)
Accessing workflow specification
my_instance.workflow # old
MyClass.workflow_spec # new
Accessing states, events, meta, e.g.
my_instance.workflow.states(:some_state).events(:some_event).meta[:some_meta_tag] # old
MyClass.workflow_spec.states[:some_state].events[:some_event].meta[:some_meta_tag] # new
Causing state transitions
my_instance.workflow.my_event # old
my_instance.my_event! # new
when using both a block and a callback method for an event, the block executes prior to the callback
- check if a certain transition possible from the current state with
can_....? - fix workflow_state persistence for multiple_workflows example
- add before_transition and after_transition hooks as suggested by kasperbn
- fix issue#10 Workflow::create_workflow_diagram documentation and path escaping
- fix issue#7 workflow_column does not work STI (single table inheritance) ActiveRecord models
- fix issue#5 Diagram generation fails for models in modules
- enable multiple workflows by connecting workflow to object instances (using metaclass) instead of connecting to a class, s. "Multiple Workflows" section
- fix issue#3 change the behaviour of halt! to immediately raise an exception. See also http://github.com/geekq/workflow/issues/#issue/3
- completely rewritten the documentation to match my branch
- switch to jeweler for building gems
- use gemcutter for gem distribution
- every described feature is backed up by an automated test
Intermixing of transition graph definition (states, transitions) on the one side and implementation of the actions on the other side for a bigger state machine can introduce clutter.
To reduce this clutter it is now possible to use state entry- and exit- hooks defined through a naming convention. For example, if there is a state :pending, then instead of using a block:
state :pending do
on_entry do
# your implementation here
end
end
you can hook in by defining method
def on_pending_exit(new_state, event, *args)
# your implementation here
end
anywhere in your class. You can also use a simpler function signature
like def on_pending_exit(*args) if your are not interested in
arguments. Please note: def on_pending_exit() with an empty list
would not work.
If both a function with a name according to naming convention and the on_entry/on_exit block are given, then only on_entry/on_exit block is used.
http://github.com/geekq/workflow/issues
Author: Vladimir Dobriakov, http://www.innoq.com/blog/vd, http://blog.geekq.net/
Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Vodafone
Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Ryan Allen, FlashDen Pty Ltd
Based on the work of Ryan Allen and Scott Barron
Licensed under MIT license, see the MIT-LICENSE file.