OPNET-629: Add second HAProxy healthcheck port #1728
Conversation
In order to improve the robustness of the on-prem HAProxy instance, we have added a second healthcheck port in openshift/machine-config-operator#4767 This corresponds to the existing 9444 port, but because the surrounding ports were already in use I moved it an even 10 away.
|
@cybertron: This pull request references OPNET-629 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/hold I wanted to get this proposed, but before we merge it I want to get reviews on the dependent patch to ensure we actually implement this. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
@cybertron: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
In order to improve the robustness of the on-prem HAProxy instance, we have added a second healthcheck port in
openshift/machine-config-operator#4767 This corresponds to the existing 9444 port, but because the surrounding ports were already in use I moved it an even 10 away.