Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Snyk] Fix for 14 vulnerabilities #80

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 14 vulnerabilities #80

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mongoloidkhulmikuki366385
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • demos/TinyDice/front/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
critical severity 786/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.3		 Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
SNYK-JS-BABELTRAVERSE-5962462		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 631/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.2		 Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 641/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.4		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-JSON5-3182856		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3042992		 Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3043105		 Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3105943		 Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1018905		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 681/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.2		 Command Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1040724		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 731/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.2		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-567746		 Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 686/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.3		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-608086		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MINIMATCH-3050818		 Yes No Known Exploit
low severity 506/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-2429795		 Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 601/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6		 Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-559764		 Yes Proof of Concept
low severity 506/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:debug:20170905		 Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: babel-eslint The new version differs by 28 commits.
  • 4bd049e 10.1.0
  • 2c754a8 Update Babel to ^7.7.0 and enable Flow enums parsing (#812)
  • 183d13e 10.0.3
  • 354953d fix: require eslint dependencies from eslint base (#794)
  • 48f6d78 10.0.2
  • 0241b48 removed unused file reference (#773)
  • 4cf0a21 10.0.1
  • 98c1f13 Revert #584 (#697)
  • 8f78e28 10.0.0
  • 717fba7 test value should be switched
  • 020d012 Treat type alias declarationlike function declaration (#584)
  • b400cb1 Test eslint5, update peerDep (#690)
  • c333bd6 Drop old monkeypatching behavior (#689)
  • 6aa8b6f 9.0.0
  • c7ee9ae Bump to [email protected] 🎉 (#676)
  • 3ece549 Docs: Make the default parserOptions more explicit (#673)
  • 0b36951 Add logical assignment plugin (#674)
  • 5856ff5 Bump some devDeps
  • 45938d9 build(deps): upgrade @ babel/* to 7.0.0-rc.2 (#668)
  • bc97875 9.0.0-beta.3
  • 74c5d62 update lock
  • 6a45632 chore - fixing eslint-scope to a safe version; resolves #656. (#657)
  • e0119e0 9.0.0-beta.2
  • 198964b Merge pull request #645 from rubennorte/support-new-flow-syntax-in-scope-analysis

See the full diff

Package name: eslint-loader The new version differs by 39 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution
🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Command Injection

@snyk-bot
fix: demos/TinyDice/front/package.json to reduce vulnerabilities
eb97b1c 
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BABELTRAVERSE-5962462
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JSON5-3182856
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3042992
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3043105
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LOADERUTILS-3105943
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-1018905
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-1040724
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-567746
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-LODASH-608086
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-MINIMATCH-3050818
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-2429795
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-559764
- https://snyk.io/vuln/npm:debug:20170905
@performance-testing-bot Performance Testing Bot
Copy link

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated Pull Request Quantifier (deprecated)
Copy link

This PR has 4 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details 

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +2 -2
Percentile : 1.6%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +2 -2

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@vizipi Vizipi
Copy link

vizipi bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Pull request analysis by VIZIPI

Below you will find who is the most qualified team member to review your code.
This analysis includes his/her work on the code included in this Pull request, in addition to their experience in code affected by these changes ( partly found within the list of potential missing files below )   Feedback always welcome

No other active qualified developers found to review these specific changes. You might consider involving more team members with these code segments.

Potential missing files from this Pull request

No commonly committed files found with a 40% threashold

Committed file ranks

(click to expand)
  • 99.22%[demos/TinyDice/front/package.json]

    • Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers
    No reviews
    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    Extra Small
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    your own tron
    2 participants
    @mongoloidkhulmikuki366385 @snyk-bot