Check if code coverage analysis cares about comments when calculating line coverage

[alexvy86]

Description

Adding a bunch of comments to a file, to see if the reported line coverage decreases due to longer comment blocks. Hopefully not :).

Also checking if functions in comments cause the stats (% of functions covered) for the file to change incorrectly.

Reviewer Guidance

The review process is outlined on this wiki page.

[msfluid-bot]

Code Coverage Summary

↑ packages.dds.tree.src.events:
Line Coverage Change: 20.30%    Branch Coverage Change: No change

Metric Name	Baseline coverage	PR coverage	Coverage Diff
Branch Coverage	91.66%	91.66%	→ No change
Line Coverage	71.65%	91.95%	↑ 20.30%

---

Baseline commit: e0e9c89
Baseline build: 305911
Happy Coding!!

Code coverage comparison check passed!!

[msfluid-bot]

⯅ @fluid-example/bundle-size-tests: +245 Bytes

Metric Name	Baseline Size	Compare Size	Size Diff
aqueduct.js	464.33 KB	464.36 KB	⯅ +35 Bytes
azureClient.js	563.18 KB	563.23 KB	⯅ +49 Bytes
connectionState.js	724 Bytes	724 Bytes	■ No change
containerRuntime.js	262.48 KB	262.5 KB	⯅ +14 Bytes
fluidFramework.js	426.65 KB	426.66 KB	⯅ +14 Bytes
loader.js	134.18 KB	134.19 KB	⯅ +14 Bytes
map.js	42.71 KB	42.71 KB	⯅ +7 Bytes
matrix.js	148.36 KB	148.36 KB	⯅ +7 Bytes
odspClient.js	528.97 KB	529.02 KB	⯅ +49 Bytes
odspDriver.js	97.88 KB	97.9 KB	⯅ +21 Bytes
odspPrefetchSnapshot.js	42.81 KB	42.83 KB	⯅ +14 Bytes
sharedString.js	164.26 KB	164.27 KB	⯅ +7 Bytes
sharedTree.js	417.11 KB	417.11 KB	⯅ +7 Bytes
Total Size	3.37 MB	3.37 MB	⯅ +245 Bytes

---

Baseline commit: e0e9c89

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 05a4257

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more