-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Project Template #490
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,9 +1,16 @@ | ||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> | ||
<Project DefaultTargets="Build"> | ||
<Sdk Name="Microsoft.Build.Sql" Version="###ASSEMBLY_VERSION###" /> | ||
<PropertyGroup> | ||
<Name>SqlProject1</Name> | ||
<DSP>Microsoft.Data.Tools.Schema.Sql.{TargetPlatform}DatabaseSchemaProvider</DSP> | ||
<ModelCollation>1033, CI</ModelCollation> | ||
</PropertyGroup> | ||
</Project> | ||
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.Build.Sql/###ASSEMBLY_VERSION###" DefaultTargets="Build"> | ||
|
||
<PropertyGroup> | ||
<SqlTargetName>SqlProject1</SqlTargetName> | ||
<DacVersion>1.0.0.0<DacVersion> | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is already defined in Microsoft.Data.Tools.Schema.SqlTasks.targets. Is this just to add visibility to this property? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's that changing the Name tag has zero effect on changing the file name, while setting this property changes both the Name in the Metadata of the Dacpac AND the filename. The SDK.targets file either needs to use Name to set the SqlTargetName, or just use the SSDT targets property directly. For DacVersion, yes it's in the Targets file but only if the version is not set. Setting Either way, the only way right now for an end user to know these properties exist is to dig through the Microsoft.Data.Tools.Schema.SqlTasks.targets file in the NuGet package... which is not helpful. |
||
<DSP>Microsoft.Data.Tools.Schema.Sql.{TargetPlatform}DatabaseSchemaProvider</DSP> | ||
<ModelCollation>1033, CI</ModelCollation> | ||
</PropertyGroup> | ||
|
||
<!-- Correct the build in Visual Studio so it doesn't trigger a NuGet Framework Reference error. | ||
<Target Name="PreBuild" BeforeTargets="PreBuildEvent" Condition="'$(MSBuildRuntimeType)' != 'Core'"> | ||
<Message Importance="high" Text="Ensuring the $(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)\obj\project.assets.json file is removed, if necessary, so that the database project can be built through VisualStudio SSDT without errors" /> | ||
<Delete Files="$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)\obj\project.assets.json" /> | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If I understand correctly, this target would be triggered for every build. @Ri7Sh Do you see any issues with that? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @robertmclaws Can you please raise an issue describing the bug as well? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The code originally came from this post: #180 (comment) and fixes issue #180. If you think it would be better in the SDK.targets file, I'm happy to do another check-in that moves it there. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ah - clarifying in this thread - this doesn't fix support in VS, it fixes the specific case in VS when you try to build the project after having built it on the same machine with .NET 8 (cli or VS Code). This would be good to resolve @Ri7Sh but let's make sure we converge on an approach in the .NET template as well as in the VS template. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @dzsquared I believe that is correct. For more context, if you build in VS the first time, it will build correctly. But let's say you're trying to verify the build on the CLI so you're sure it will run in your CI/CD pipeline. So you run a The next time you will build in Visual Studio, you will get the following error:
But that is not explicitly a .NET 8 problem, as this happened while I was trying to move to an SDK-style project in a .NET 9 RC2 app. I personally believe it is an issue in the downstream targets file that sneaks in a .NET Framework reference to get the compiler to work, which I believe is a mistake. But I can't find where to contribute a fix to that targets file. Including this in the project template makes sure that error doesn't happen. if you would like I can take this out of this PR and put it in a separate one... however this PR contained everything I needed to get a build working consistently both locally and in Azure DevOps, which is why this fix was also included here, so it could get into customer's hands ASAP during the preview, and you cold maybe move the fix somewhere more appropriate later. HTH! |
||
</Target> | ||
|
||
</Project> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The default for
SqlTargetName
is actually just$(MSBuildProjectName)
so it does seem like theName
is not honored.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that is why I changed it. Changing the name did not change the filename at all. So instead of using a property that literally nothing else uses (
Name
), I bubbled up the existing property from SSDT.