495-testDrarft

[TobiasNx]

@fsteeg could you help me with the test? the objectSleeper?

[fsteeg]

You should first fix the compiler and build errors (missing imports, wrong file / class name, missing variables, formatting).

Conceptually, the idea looks good, though you will have to call process at some point to actually run the workflow, and instead of the if-statement, you should use something like assertTrue(timeElapsed >= sleepTime) to verify the result. But to compare them like this, they have to be numbers (instead of Instant), e.g. from System.nanoTime().

As expressed by my approval in #495, I think it would be fine to go without a test here, if you don't want to dig into this.